Sherman123
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Messages
- 7,774
- Reaction score
- 3,791
- Location
- Northeast US
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
One can perhaps cut your grandfather some slack, given what he had himself suffered at the hands of the Germans, but it doesn't change the fact that what he did meets every rational definition of robbery, murder and terrorism, and not of legitimate “freedom fighting”. Even in war, there are standards of ethical conduct, and what you describe here does not meet these standards.
If there had been any body interested in pursuing such prosecutions, your grandfather could very legitimately have been tried and convicted as a war criminal.
I fundamentally disagree. This is the kind of thinking that would have forbidden someone from striking back at a totalitarian regime on the scale of 1984 because security personal were out of reach. There is such a thing as utilitarianism in my book, and the aforementioned examples are some of the best cases arguing in favor of an occasional 'ends justify the means' approach. Why was my grandfather justified in murdering that farmer? Because fighting back against the Nazis was justified by almost any means necessary. Just as our decision to use nuclear weapons on Japan was motivated by a utilitarian objective.