• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex[W:141]

Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

1.) yes i did it was comprehensible :shrug:
2.) as usual your thought wrong
3.) i have no idea how to answer this question because its full of fallacies.Ill give it a shot though.

A.) in general no i dont agree with people trying to deny equal rights which is what is factually going on.
B.) states don't get to infringe on individual rights, and this is why some of the states they have done this and have been pushed to their own SSCs have lost
C.) marriage isnt in danger, equal rights doesnt endanger it.

anything else?
A
Exactly what is an equal right IYV? Is it one I agree with or one with which you agree? As an example, would I have a right to smoke in your world?
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

No, that's counting the number of ballot measure successes.

There are more if you count legislation.

So, why don't you tell me how many states have to legalize it via ballot measure or via legislation to meet your threshold of "will of the people?"

Three quarters and without judiciary strongarming.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

A
Exactly what is an equal right IYV? Is it one I agree with or one with which you agree? As an example, would I have a right to smoke in your world?

Equal protection under the law, as per the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution. Gender-based classifications can be challenged under the 14th.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

And, if you're read my posts in the past you'd know I don't really care all that much who marries whom. Sure I don't believe we ought to endorse homosexual marriage, but it's not a big deal for me either way.
1.)You may have me confused with Agent J who is absolutely obsessed with the subject.
2.) He's so invested somehow that he starts thread after thread on it, rehashing the same old content
3.)- his opinons, which we all know by now are "fact". :mrgreen:

another attempt to make the thread about me since you cant back up the lies you posted.

1.) yes like most Americans i respect, want and fight for equal rights and freedoms
2.) only old content here are the lies you have posted and posters have destroyed and proved wrong, if you knew about this topic you would know that this case possibly being argued on the 14th is not old content. Facts prove your post wrong again.
3.) if you believe that lie to be true simply provide factual evidence of it

ao once again when you are ready to STAY ON TOPIC all we need is you to be civil and post any facts that support your proven wrong posts :)
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Three quarters and without judiciary strongarming.

Ok. We'll talk to you then. Have a nice day.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Ok. We'll talk to you then. Have a nice day.

You too.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Equal protection under the law, as per the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution. Gender-based classifications can be challenged under the 14th.

The fourteenth was enacted to protect the rights of the former slaves, not gender...
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

A
1.) Exactly what is an equal right IYV? Is it one I agree with or one with which you agree?
2.) As an example, would I have a right to smoke in your world?

has nothing to do with you and me it has to do with facts, laws, rights, court cases and court precedence

for a better answer simply see the SSCs rulings on this issue and how they refer to equal rights and equality and not allowing discrimination.

2.) i dont own any world :shrug:
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

has nothing to do with you and me it has to do with facts, laws, rights, court cases and court precedence

for a better answer simply see the SSCs rulings on this issue and how they refer to equal rights and equality and not allowing discrimination.

2.) i dont own any world :shrug:

You're pretty good at not answering direct questions, but that is a fairly obvious trait...
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

The fourteenth was enacted to protect the rights of the former slaves, not gender...

It may have been enacted that way but that's not how it works now. It does apply to gender and religious affiliation.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

I love the fear that Equal Rights brings out in people that support discrimination, inequality and or bigotry, its hilarious!

the writing is on the wall and they know they are losing and they have lost, its just a matter of time now and they are panicked.

All the failed arguments against equal rights for gays were heard time and time again against slavery, equal rights for woman/minorities and against interracial marriage.

Eventually they all failed because they were illogical, bigoted and or mentally retarded them and that holds true today.

#EQUALRIGHTSISWINNING
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

It may have been enacted that way but that's not how it works now. It does apply to gender and religious affiliation.

Oh, believe me I understand this, and it's why I have a problem with the courts deciding what our laws mean and not simply deciding cases on Constitutional grounds...
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

You're pretty good at not answering direct questions, but that is a fairly obvious trait...
another post attmepted to make the topic about me instead of anything factual going against the OP

1.) was factually answered, just cause you dont like the answer thats not my fault.
you asked if equal rights was about what me or you agree on and i answered

2.) your question didnt make any sense nor did it have anything to do with the topic

try again though please the deflections are SUPER entertaining
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

I love the fear that Equal Rights brings out in people that support discrimination, inequality and or bigotry, its hilarious!

the writing is on the wall and they know they are losing and they have lost, its just a matter of time now and they are panicked.

All the failed arguments against equal rights for gays were heard time and time again against slavery, equal rights for woman/minorities and against interracial marriage.

Eventually they all failed because they were illogical, bigoted and or mentally retarded them and that holds true today.

#EQUALRIGHTSISWINNING

Do I have a right to smoke?
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Oh, believe me I understand this, and it's why I have a problem with the courts deciding what our laws mean and not simply deciding cases on Constitutional grounds...

So, are you saying you don't think people should be awarded equal protection under the law when it comes to gender and religion?
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

another post attmepted to make the topic about me instead of anything factual going against the OP

1.) was factually answered, just cause you dont like the answer thats not my fault.
you asked if equal rights was about what me or you agree on and i answered

2.) your question didnt make any sense nor did it have anything to do with the topic

try again though please the deflections are SUPER entertaining

Sorry, but you do not get to decide whether or not you answered factually, nor do you get to decide that just because you can't comprehend a question doesn't make sense in AJs world...
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Do I have a right to smoke?

smoke what?
smoke where?
smoke how?
how does smoking relate to equal, human and civil rights for gays? oh thats right it doesnt

sorry cant answer the illogical question without more info
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

So, are you saying you don't think people should be awarded equal protection under the law when it comes to gender and religion?

Until recently, these protections were understood...
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Until recently, these protections were understood...

You didn't answer the question.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

smoke what?
smoke where?
smoke how?
how does smoking relate to equal, human and civil rights for gays? oh thats right it doesnt

sorry cant answer the illogical question without more info

Yeah, I figured you wouldn't be smart enough to understand the term "smoke". It happens all the time...
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

1.)Sorry, but you do not get to decide whether or not you answered factually
2.), nor do you get to decide that just because you can't comprehend a question doesn't make sense in AJs world...

1.) agree but the fact remains i did and that wasnt a decision i made, facts did that
2.) i agree with this also but it factually dint make sense per the topic

sorry but your deflection fails
is there any facts you'd like to discuss about this topic or any related questios you have that makes sense and have real answers? please feel free and please stay on topic, this inst about me.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Yeah, I figured you wouldn't be smart enough to understand the term "smoke". It happens all the time...

another deflection and personal failed insult instead of actually staying civil and on topic :shrug:

so you aren't going to supply the needed info? oh well let us know when you can.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Oh, believe me I understand this, and it's why I have a problem with the courts deciding what our laws mean and not simply deciding cases on Constitutional grounds...

Whether you like it or not, the Constitution has been interpreted for situations that the founding fathers could NEVER have realized in their time. SSM WILL happen, and YOU and others will eventually have to DEAL WITH it. All the whining in the world from the right isn't going to prevent it. Hell, even the GOP now is realizing this and starting to change to the side of SSM. Face it, the anti-SSM has lost and now they are just delaying the inevitable like the spoiled little brats they are.
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

You didn't answer the question.

Do you agree with the ACA requirement of the employers having to provide birth control regardless of their religious beliefs?
 
Re: Judge says he'll try to rule by early January on challenge to Utah's same-sex mar

Do you agree with the ACA requirement of the employers having to provide birth control regardless of their religious beliefs?

You still haven't answered the question. Is there a reason you're unwilling to answer?
 
Back
Top Bottom