• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Militia group calls for Obama's assassination

We actually don't have to do anything, the problem will take care of itself. What we're all waiting for are the leaded gasoline poisoned generations of the 40's, 50's, 60's, and partially 70's to die and leave the Earth to the more peaceful, non poisoned generations. We're already seeing a massive decline from the peak around 1990 when the lead babies in their 20's and 30's were in their most dangerous prime. Just so happens this trend also correlates with the rise of conservatism... lower iq's, more aggression, inability to think through complex issues, its all intertwined.

FUNNY ! :lamo:lamo:


Public Service Announcement

The American Psychological Association is searching for all who exhibit certain types of neurosis for long term research. See: Loony-toons Research Holding Facility for possible referrals.

Some seek a different type of Asylum

Thom Paine
 
That's one way of looking at it, lead poisoning equates to less violence.

Personally I prefer a large internal combustion engine with dual Holley quad carbs sucking up high octane leaded gas = horsepower with high torque and speed.

BTW: Doesn't explain why todays generation has lower SAT scores today than 45 years ago even after dumbing down the SAT twice to increase the scores and today they are allowed to use calculators which weren't allowed by that leaded out generation.

Yeah I'm sure lead poisoning makes you better Apache :mrgreen:

Is this a fact that SAT scores are lower today or is this another one of your wishful ideas? If its true that SAT really are lower today is there an explanation that supports your assertions or is this just a cherry picked correlation you want to use?
 
Well I should hope you lead babies figured out how to get all the money, considering you were the only people alive at the time. Doh! Those darn absent critical thinking skills git me every time!

Oh. Geeze. You mean all those other folks that were around were dead? And aren't you alive now too?

However, my mistake. I guess that answers some questions.

(I'm thinking even the concept of something called critical thinking skills is a far off development for at least some of you kids.)
 
Generally those who claim the southern poverty law center is a "hate group" are those the splc busted. A quick look at your far far right wing hack sources kind of verifies this.

Busted for what ?

It's the SPLC who said anyone who didn't vote for Obama is a racist. They also said anyone who opposed Obamacare was a racist.

The SPLC started out as a non partisan legitimate organization with a nobel cause. Along the way they got greedy when they discovered how rich they could get from stupid people donating money to the SPLC. They discovered if they keep moving to the fringe of the left, more money.

One of the links I provided reveals why you no longer will find any black faces working in the SPLC office. Just about ever black who has worked for the SPLC has filed a racial discrimination law suit against the SPLC.
 
Generally those who claim the southern poverty law center is a "hate group" are those the splc busted. A quick look at your far far right wing hack sources kind of verifies this.

Well that's convenient isn't it Rob? Disagree with the SPLC and they must be a hate group...Good Grief. :doh
 
Oh. Geeze. You mean all those other folks that were around were dead? And aren't you alive now too?

However, my mistake. I guess that answers some questions.

(I'm thinking even the concept of something called critical thinking skills is a far off development for at least some of you kids.)

Wut?

In my op I talked about people born and raised in the 40's, 50's, 60's and partially 70's, you know, the old people of today, they have all the money because... they...are...older...they've been playing the game longer, while newer generations either weren't born yet or are quite young.... do you follow? You don't expect teenagers and those in their 20's to take over everything immediately do you? LoL

Or perhaps you think in your head that conservatives have all the money? LoL, that's funny. A lot of the wealthy and rich support libertarianism and conservative causes because it pads their bottom line, pretty basic play that should be obvious. Besides that I think the spread is pretty even isn't it?

Either way your statements don't make much sense.
 
Wut?

In my op I talked about people born and raised in the 40's, 50's, 60's and partially 70's, you know, the old people of today, they have all the money because... they...are...older...they've been playing the game longer, while newer generations either weren't born yet or are quite young.... do you follow? You don't expect teenagers and those in their 20's to take over everything immediately do you? LoL

Or perhaps you think in your head that conservatives have all the money? LoL, that's funny. A lot of the wealthy and rich support libertarianism and conservative causes because it pads their bottom line, pretty basic play that should be obvious. Besides that I think the spread is pretty even isn't it?

Either way your statements don't make much sense.

Actually, given the sense of entitlement, and the attitude, I don't expect teenagers and those in their 20's to take over much of anything.

When adding in the logic displayed by your own words, I'm more than confident this is true.
 
Yeah I'm sure lead poisoning makes you better Apache :mrgreen:

Is this a fact that SAT scores are lower today or is this another one of your wishful ideas? If its true that SAT really are lower today is there an explanation that supports your assertions or is this just a cherry picked correlation you want to use?

College Board 'Concerned' About Low SAT Scores : NPR


The dumbing down of the SAT:

>"1980 test and associated changes[edit]The inclusion of the "Strivers" Score study was implemented. This study was introduced by The Educational Testing Service, which administers the SAT, and has been conducting research on how to make it easier for minorities and individuals who suffer from social and economic barriers.

The original "Strivers" project, which was in the research phase from 1980–1994, awarded special "Striver" status to test-takers who scored 200 points higher than expected for their race, gender and income level. The belief was that this would give minorities a better chance at being accepted into a college of higher standard, e.g. an Ivy League school. In 1992, the Strivers Project was leaked to the public; as a result the Strivers Project was terminated in 1993. After Federal Courts heard arguments from the ACLU, NAACP and the Educational Testing Service, the courts ordered the study to alter its data collection process, stating that only the age, race and zip code could be used to determine the test-takers eligibility for "Strivers" points.

These changes were introduced to the SAT effective in 1994.

1994 changes[edit]In 1994 the verbal section received a dramatic change in focus. Among these changes were the removal of antonym questions, and an increased focus on passage reading. The mathematics section also saw a dramatic change in 1994, thanks in part to pressure from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. For the first time since 1935, the SAT asked some non-multiple choice questions, instead requiring students to supply the answers. 1994 also saw the introduction of calculators into the mathematics section for the first time in the test's history. The mathematics section introduced concepts of probability, slope, elementary statistics, counting problems, median and mode.[24]

The average score on the 1994 modification of the SAT I was usually around 1000 (500 on the verbal, 500 on the math). The most selective schools in the United States (for example, those in the Ivy League) typically had SAT averages exceeding 1400 on the old test[citation needed].

1995 re-centering (raising mean score back to 500)[edit]The test scoring was initially scaled to make 500 the mean score on each section with a standard deviation of 100.[26] As the test grew more popular and more students from less rigorous schools began taking the test, the average dropped to about 428 Verbal and 478 Math. The SAT was "recentered" in 1995, and the average "new" score became again close to 500. Scores awarded after 1994 and before October 2001 are officially reported with an "R" (e.g. 1260R) to reflect this change. Old scores may be recentered to compare to 1995 to present scores by using official College Board tables,[27] which in the middle ranges add about 70 points to Verbal and 20 or 30 points to Math. In other words, current students have a 100 (70 plus 30) point advantage over their parents.

1995 re-centering controversy[edit]Certain educational organizations viewed the SAT re-centering initiative as an attempt to stave off international embarrassment in regard to continuously declining test scores, even among top students. As evidence, it was presented that the number of pupils who scored above 600 on the verbal portion of the test had fallen from a peak of 112,530 in 1972 to 73,080 in 1993, a 36% backslide, despite the fact that the total number of test-takers had risen over 500,000.[28]"<

SAT - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

:attn1: WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY
Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia; that is, a voluntary association of individuals and groups working to develop a common resource of human knowledge. The structure of the project allows anyone with an Internet connection to alter its content. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information. Wikipedia:General disclaimer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Where in that massive blob did it say anything relevant to what we're talking about?

Off the top of my head, what about changing demographics over the years? Are the quality of schools worse?

Not to mention your argument should be focusing more on iq than just the SAT if you're insisting people are overall less intelligent now than they were 40-50 years ago.
 
I find it very hard to believe anyone is really that stupid.

With all the dumb crap going on in this country, I don't. They're probably a bunch of morbidly obese hicks who hang confederate flags everywhere, and incessantly bitch about how black people and mexicans are ruining the "moral fiber" of the nation with their baggy pants, and rap music.
 
Where in that massive blob did it say anything relevant to what we're talking about?

Off the top of my head, what about changing demographics over the years? Are the quality of schools worse?

Not to mention your argument should be focusing more on iq than just the SAT if you're insisting people are overall less intelligent now than they were 40-50 years ago.

Well, I don't know, but it seems to me we leaded folks designed a way to put man on the moon using little more than a slide rule, and you unleaded folks need GPS on a cell phone to get to the store.

Kind of says it all.
 
Well, I don't know, but it seems to me we leaded folks designed a way to put man on the moon using little more than a slide rule, and you unleaded folks need GPS on a cell phone to get to the store.

Kind of says it all.

It's a trend, and a spectrum. It doesn't mean ALL, EVERY, of the group, it means overall. Some were highly exposed and others not so much. Big cities were the worst as lead emissions were concentrated because of the ratio of active vehicles to land area. This led to the trend that cities were more dangerous places and the country was much safer. This has since equalized as to being about the same per capita.
 
It's a trend, and a spectrum. It doesn't mean ALL, EVERY, of the group, it means overall. Some were highly exposed and others not so much. Big cities were the worst as lead emissions were concentrated because of the ratio of active vehicles to land area. This led to the trend that cities were more dangerous places and the country was much safer. This has since equalized as to being about the same per capita.

Yea, overall. So you've been taught that overall, big cities contain more cars per capita than urban environments. Okay.
 
Yea, overall. So you've been taught that overall, big cities contain more cars per capita than urban environments. Okay.

Uhhh, I don't know about per capita it may actually be the opposite because many use mass transit or walk more, but...

Cities are more densely populated per land area than are small towns in the country. Above the land is air. The amount of vehicles (specifically total emissions not necessarily how many but how much) actively used in cities divided by the land area gives a higher concentration of pollutants in the air. This is why more densely populated areas have more problems with smog and stricter regulations had to be enacted. This is why people in cities were exposed to much higher levels of lead than those in the country. In the country the emissions were less concentrated, more dispersed, much cleaner air.
 
Last edited:
Where in that massive blob did it say anything relevant to what we're talking about?

Off the top of my head, what about changing demographics over the years? Are the quality of schools worse?
.

That's right, you identify yourself as a progressive. And it was the progressives who used science to back up their claim that non northern Europeans were inferior. That not all races and ethnicities are equal. That some minorities of certain ethnicities and races can't compete in society. That's why certain minorities deserve breaks, special privileges and protections. May be even some free stuff in exchange for their votes.

Old Obsessions, Modern Concerns: Re-Evaluating the Dillingham Commission at 100

Looking Back on Prior Immigration

Northern Illinois University Press

Dillingham Commission

Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America - Daniel J. Tichenor - Google Books
 
Uhhh, I don't know about per capita it may actually be the opposite because many use mass transit or walk more, but...

Cities are more densely populated per land area than are small towns in the country. Above the land is air. The amount of vehicles (specifically total emissions not necessarily how many but how much) actively used in cities divided by the land area gives a higher concentration of pollutants in the air. This is why more densely populated areas have more problems with smog and stricter regulations had to be enacted. This is why people in cities were exposed to much higher levels of lead than those in the country. In the country the emissions were less concentrated, more dispersed, much cleaner air.


I see.

Well, you know, demographics have shown for decades that liberals tend to concentrate in cities. You made a claim about lead and conservatives. It would appear you don't have a clue what you're posting, other than the typical Progressive pap, since Liberal/Progressives would have been receiving the highest concentrations of lead.

Here's a reminder of what you posted.

We're already seeing a massive decline from the peak around 1990 when the lead babies in their 20's and 30's were in their most dangerous prime. Just so happens this trend also correlates with the rise of conservatism... lower iq's, more aggression, inability to think through complex issues, its all intertwined.


I think you've displayed everything that is required to be known. Perhaps even an indicator of future prospects.
 
Last edited:
I see.

Well, you know, demographics have shown for decades that liberals tend to concentrate in cities. You made a claim about lead and conservatives. It would appear you don't have a clue what you're posting, other than the typical Progressive pap, since Liberal/Progressives would have been receiving the highest concentrations of lead.

Here's a reminder of what you posted.

We're already seeing a massive decline from the peak around 1990 when the lead babies in their 20's and 30's were in their most dangerous prime. Just so happens this trend also correlates with the rise of conservatism... lower iq's, more aggression, inability to think through complex issues, its all intertwined.


I think you've displayed everything that is required to be known. Perhaps even an indicator of future prospects.

I threw in the conservative trash talk to combat Apacherats constant **** talking of liberals being the cause of all of America's woes. As far as lead poisoned earlier generations, I stand by it.
 
That's right, you identify yourself as a progressive. And it was the progressives who used science to back up their claim that non northern Europeans were inferior. That not all races and ethnicities are equal. That some minorities of certain ethnicities and races can't compete in society. That's why certain minorities deserve breaks, special privileges and protections. May be even some free stuff in exchange for their votes.

Old Obsessions, Modern Concerns: Re-Evaluating the Dillingham Commission at 100

Looking Back on Prior Immigration

Northern Illinois University Press

Dillingham Commission

Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America - Daniel J. Tichenor - Google Books

Hold on one sec I'll be back, I'm going to go off topic and post a bunch of links to do mah 'talkin 4 me.
 
Busted for what ?

It's the SPLC who said anyone who didn't vote for Obama is a racist. They also said anyone who opposed Obamacare was a racist.

Then it should be easy for you to find this exact quote in context. I await I suspect for nothing.

APACHERAT said:
The SPLC started out as a non partisan legitimate organization with a nobel cause. Along the way they got greedy when they discovered how rich they could get from stupid people donating money to the SPLC. They discovered if they keep moving to the fringe of the left, more money.

One of the links I provided reveals why you no longer will find any black faces working in the SPLC office. Just about ever black who has worked for the SPLC has filed a racial discrimination law suit against the SPLC.

More whiny jib-jab with no proof... aside from extremist partisan hack sites.
 
Well that's convenient isn't it Rob? Disagree with the SPLC and they must be a hate group...Good Grief. :doh

People bitching about the SPLC are counter punching. Nothing more. Unless you got something to show me from a non-BS extremist partisan hack site... I'm willing to check it out.
 
I see.

Well, you know, demographics have shown for decades that liberals tend to concentrate in cities. You made a claim about lead and conservatives. It would appear you don't have a clue what you're posting, other than the typical Progressive pap, since Liberal/Progressives would have been receiving the highest concentrations of lead.

Here's a reminder of what you posted.

We're already seeing a massive decline from the peak around 1990 when the lead babies in their 20's and 30's were in their most dangerous prime. Just so happens this trend also correlates with the rise of conservatism... lower iq's, more aggression, inability to think through complex issues, its all intertwined.


I think you've displayed everything that is required to be known. Perhaps even an indicator of future prospects.

You beat me to it.

May explain how Obama got elected. The cities that heavily voted for Obama have the highest rates of lead poisoning. In fact just about every area of America known as "Obama's America" have extremely high rates of lead poisoning. The inner cities being the worse.
 
Then it should be easy for you to find this exact quote in context. I await I suspect for nothing.



More whiny jib-jab with no proof... aside from extremist partisan hack sites.

Go to the SPLC website and start reading the blogs.
 
Go to the SPLC website and start reading the blogs.

I'll just quote myself here just to show how right I was...

poweRob said:
Then it should be easy for you to find this exact quote in context. I await I suspect for nothing.
 
Back
Top Bottom