Know the truth and the truth will make you mad, because the truth has no agenda.
You have a poor showing when you're trying to argue against something I actually say, don't try your chances with that which I don't, k?
Further, Mr. Quick-to-Cover-Obama's-Jock, I did read the story, THE WHOLE THING, and as your query suggests, people around here, don't usually read the links provided, you're guilty of this yourself, so, naturally, the first glimpse of the keyword "anonymous" I pulled, (wrongfully in this case, heh, go figure) I went with.
I said and I'll quote
Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
The "anonymous" source is huge problem for the credibility of the story, imo. Until we know who the source is.....meh.
This is what I wrote with the context in which I wrote it, where in the Sam Hill did I infer, suggest, imply, or give any inkling that this was some sort of grand conspiracy to re-elect Obama?The Census employee caught faking the results is Julius Buckmon, according to confidential Census documents obtained by The Post. Buckmon told me in an interview this past weekend that he was told to make up information by higher-ups at Census.
Eh? Oh, that's right, it wasn't... it was you talking out of your ass...
I can't post anything on a thread that has Obama's name in it without you running to Obama's resucue, hands cupped, screaming "I'm comin for ya Beanie Boy!!!"
Right, but you've still got a lock on his jock like a pitbull...Cover Obama's Jock? As of now, nothing ties this story to Obama whatsoever.
Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.