MichaelJR
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2013
- Messages
- 1,089
- Reaction score
- 518
- Location
- Suckachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
No, it doesnt. Not guilty is not saying he was Proven innocent, there was not enough evidence to convict him. Remeber he killed the other witness.
He doesn't have to be proven innocent. He's innocent until proven guilty in this country (at least that's how it's supposed to be before the media became the judge jury and executioner), thus, by default he's innocent. Burden is on the state.
No I remember there being a whole slew of witnesses on the stand.