Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 120

Thread: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

  1. #31
    On Vacation
    joko104's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:41 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    31,568
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    Quote Originally Posted by roguenuke View Post
    I'm not sure if the xray alone really would do the trick when it comes to looking for drugs. Now, was it too invasive, most likely. But it also would be good to know what the procedure normally is or what it is set as in this town or county or even state and how excessively invasive it truly was in comparison to the normal procedure. The "anally probed 8 times" thing is a bit of an exaggeration though. There were four different procedures performed while the claim being made makes it sound as if the same thing was done to the guy 8 times.
    All X-rays carry a cancer risk.

  2. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    01-17-16 @ 05:09 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,122

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    Quote Originally Posted by Erod View Post
    I'm curious what our man Eckert's history is with drugs and the police.

    I'd bet he wasn't the local hardware store owner with a wife and two kids....
    First they came after the scrap metal tradesman, and I didn't say anything because they are mostly indigent crack addicts stealing copper wire to support their habits....
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_t...rst_they_came_...

  3. #33
    On Vacation
    joko104's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:41 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    31,568
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    The search warrant in no manner required any doctor or medical personnel to do anything at all. For them to have gone on with X-rays, colonostomy, and the rest so radically crossed the malpractice line I would obliterate the hospital and any medical personnel involved in a judgment - including personally against those involved - that the hospital's and professionals' insurance couldn't possibly cover it. Literally hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Why? To make it ABSOLUTELY CLEAR to medical personnel and facilities everywhere that if they decide to get their kicks by abusing patients believing a search warrant gives them permission to do so - though in no manner requires they do anything at all, it will cost them everything.

    Again, NOT ONE of those medical personal nor the hospital had ANY legal obligation to do any of this. NONE. They did it because they wanted to and thought the search warrant allowed them to. As the first facility's doctor who refused stated, doing so was "unethical."

    Since the procedures were done ENTIRELY without consent, ENTIRELY against the man's stated wishes, ENTIRELY with NO potential medical benefit and WITH potential medical harm, plus inflicting pain plus drugging the man (which also carries a medical risk), they should be economically obliterated as a lesson so at every training seminar in the country ALL medical personnel are informed to never, ever do anything like this. In addition, it would inform insurance companies to advise such professionals and facilities that their malpractice policies for the future will NOT cover medical personnel nor the facility becoming employed in non-consentual evasive procedures for law enforcement UNLESS there is a medical need and benefit for the person actually involved.

  4. #34
    On Vacation
    joko104's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:41 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    31,568
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    What is despicable media coverage is hiding the name of the judge who ordered this. The proper role of a judge would instead have been to order the police not do this.

  5. #35
    free market communist
    Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    09-30-17 @ 12:27 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    26,661

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    Probed anally?

    Well, if this isn't proof that space aliens have infiltrated our police force, I don't know what is.
    "you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos

  6. #36
    cookies crumble
    ARealConservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    04-21-17 @ 09:41 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    14,518

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    Good grief. No. On one hand you have the rare case of over probing and over enforcement, on the other you have a group of addicted folks who scour the countryside for anything not locked down to destroy, steal and sell for their next fix, rinse and repeat daily.
    and the solution is to increase the cost of the things they are addicted to?

    right out of FDR's book of destroying food to improve the plight of the poor.

  7. #37
    On Vacation
    joko104's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:41 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    31,568
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    It is an indefensible lawsuit.

    There was NO search warrant, as it had expired.

    Nor was it valid if not, because the "search" was done in a different jurisdiction that the judge nor police had any jurisdiction in.

    The police response to the federal suit said the man was "known to hide drugs in his anus." What that really means is the police did this because they believed he was involved in drugs by rumor and made up all this crap to try to get him - and if not to so abuse him that he'll leave town. Small towns can be like that. If they don't want you there, the police and authorities WILL run you off by constant harassment.

    They became so radically fixed on getting him that all ethics, morality and legalities went out the window. At least they didn't drive him out in the desert near the border and just gun him down claiming he had assaulted an officer and had a knife or something.

    http://www.elpasotimes.com/latestnew...ing-nm-traffic

    What ANNOYS me is that it will be taxpayers who suffer. NOTHING will happen to the judge, those officers or the medical personnel personally. That aspect of civil law needs to change.

  8. #38
    Sage
    clownboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    08-17-16 @ 10:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    26,087

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    Quote Originally Posted by ARealConservative View Post
    and the solution is to increase the cost of the things they are addicted to?

    right out of FDR's book of destroying food to improve the plight of the poor.
    The cost doesn't matter, and neither crack nor meth is all that expensive. They're still gonna steal to pay for it because eventually they can't work because of their addiction. And what the heck does this one fellow being probed have to do with raising the cost of illegal drugs?

  9. #39
    cookies crumble
    ARealConservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    04-21-17 @ 09:41 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    14,518

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    The cost doesn't matter, and neither crack nor meth is all that expensive. They're still gonna steal to pay for it because eventually they can't work because of their addiction. And what the heck does this one fellow being probed have to do with raising the cost of illegal drugs?
    crack is a derivative of cocaine, and thus is very expensive. meth is the market response to cocaine rising in price.

  10. #40
    On Vacation
    joko104's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:41 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    31,568
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Man Claims He Was Anally Probed 8 Times Following Traffic Stop For Drugs

    This went on for 14 hours and past the expiration of the search warrant, plus in a jurisdiction that judge nor police had any jurisdiction over.

    And more... they took him across a county line, which not only is outside the jurisdiction BUT also required a hearing first.

    Since the hospital and medical personnel billed him, they also can not claim some good-faith motive as they had a personal and professional personal profit motive.

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •