Originally Posted by annata
we don't now if Perot threw the race to Clinton - if it did, fantastic. Better then GWB for another term.
But to the larger point, the MS partys are giving us candidates like Romney & Obama - both either incompetant, or plutocratic.
Its frankly amazing (yet again) that you actually prefer this sameness, hyperpartisan gridlock.
It's not just the presidential election, that is important, it's also the Congress that needs a break from the duopoly;
where a viable 3rd parrty could force a coaltion type governing
PS to "then what" it goes to the House of Representatives.
Clinton did an enormous amount of damage to our economy and yes, Bush SR would have been a far better choice.
" If no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else ? "