• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Head of the Pakistani Taliban Killed by US Drone Strike

Really? What do you know about the Contras? Do you understand what 'Contra' means in Spanish and who they were fighting against? Do you believe 'self determination' is possible in a communist regime?

What you know about Nicaragua is nonsense. I've been in that area for 20 years, have Nicaraguan people in my employ, have heard all their stories and have checked them out with "The Black Book of Communism", written by former Communists. Understand that there was a Cold War going on for 45 years and what the first casualty always is..

The Somozas were thieves and dictators. Daniel Ortega was re-elected several times in fair elections. The people of Nicaragua have a right to choose their own leaders without outside interference.
 
Your response has nothing to do with what I said. I never singled out a particular attack for criticism and I have not supported the mission of any terrorist, that is an outright lie. As I mentioned, I supported the raid to capture Bin Laden, which disproves your contention since he "bragged about being the mastermind of a suicide attack."

If you want to argue that your approve of:
  • secretly authorized remote control killing of terrorism suspects anywhere in the world
  • with no pretense of due process (fair trial]
  • with no intent to capture the suspect and put him on trial
  • even when many of them are not a threat to the USA because they are only involved in their own nation's civil war
  • away from a battlefield
  • when they are not an imminent threat which could justify a self defense claim
  • and with a probability that innocent civilians will be killed and wounded
  • and there is a strong chance that the resulting death of innocent civilians will create blowback

go ahead.

But your false claims about my sympathies do not support your argument, they are only a distraction from the truth about your opinion.

Will you still claim that such actions are acceptable if China uses a drone or other means to kill someone residing in the USA because they claim that they are a Tibetan terrorist?

That is quite the laundry list of red herrings and childish demands you offer there.

This is a thread about the killing of the head of a well-organized group of terrorists operating in lawless territory, and you think somebody can just waltz right up and serve them a subpoena? That is downright laughable.

As one who sheds only crocodile tears over their victims and screams bloody murder lest somebody so much as touches a hair on their pretty little heads, you sure do want to make it nigh on impossible to deal with them.

I guess we all have our heroes, though.
 
That is quite the laundry list of red herrings and childish demands you offer there.

This is a thread about the killing of the head of a well-organized group of terrorists operating in lawless territory, and you think somebody can just waltz right up and serve them a subpoena? That is downright laughable.

As one who sheds only crocodile tears over their victims and screams bloody murder lest somebody so much as touches a hair on their pretty little heads, you sure do want to make it nigh on impossible to deal with them.

I guess we all have our heroes, though.

It will generate a boom in the insurance industry. I'd like to hold a policy on whomsoever they announce as their new numero uno. The demographics are pretty good for a large positive return. Healthcare not so much.
 
Back
Top Bottom