• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bankrupt solar panel firm took stimulus money, left a toxic mess, says report

zimmer said:
Really... let's see... Obama has created how much debt? He has generated how many jobs? His foreign policy has made a lot of allies?

Romney a greed monger? ROTFLOL... you really have been poisoned by class warfare rhetoric.

Romney has done more good for people than Obama could dream of doing. Obama should have at least tried to run something in the private sector before running the world's largest economy. The Olympics perhaps. Or, like McGovern... at least something small like a bed & breakfast so he would learn, like McGovern, the huge problems and burdens government creates.
Click to expand...

Some truth there. He's nearly as bad as the famous president G. W. Bush, the first moron. Still, he has a few years left and may be able to surpass the feats of the "First Torturer." The memorial from George, "The GW Bush Great Recession/Depression" continues. Perhaps you hadn't noticed?
 
apdst said:
That's a myth. Do you actually believe the energy companies aren't going to corner the market if a viable product existed? Think about it.
Click to expand...

53 nations rely primarily on alternative sources of energy to generate electricity and the best argument is that a viable technology doesn't exist? It certainly isn't in the American marketplace, but it does exist and it is in use as we speak to provide power for 53 different nations. To illustrate the point, I put the Enercon E-126 wind turbine on the table. The E-126 is a 7.6MW turbine; just one of which can power more than 1,700 American homes. Europe was deploying these babies while the United States was tinkering with turbines only capable of a fraction of the output. Why weren't they sold here? Because the United States International Trade Commission prohibited them from entering the US market.
 
Napoleon said:
53 nations rely primarily on alternative sources of energy to generate electricity and the best argument is that a viable technology doesn't exist? It certainly isn't in the American marketplace, but it does exist and it is in use as we speak to provide power for 53 different nations. To illustrate the point, I put the Enercon E-126 wind turbine on the table. The E-126 is a 7.6MW turbine; just one of which can power more than 1,700 American homes. Europe was deploying these babies while the United States was tinkering with turbines only capable of a fraction of the output. Why weren't they sold here? Because the United States International Trade Commission prohibited them from entering the US market.
Click to expand...

I never said the technology doesn't exist.

What said was, "the technology isn't there yet", meaning that solar and wind energy are't technologicakly advanced enough to replace petro-fuels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom