Page 36 of 48 FirstFirst ... 26343536373846 ... LastLast
Results 351 to 360 of 478

Thread: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional [W:167:202:330]

  1. #351
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,835

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional

    Quote Originally Posted by JayDubya View Post
    Did you learn English with a dictionary where "basic" meant relying on complete falsehoods?

    Banning abortion does not infringe on anyone's rights.
    100% factually false it infringes on a woman's current legal and human rights, this fact has bee proved repeatedly and denying it doenst change this fact.

    as always if you disagree by all means bring and FACTS to the table that prove otherwise.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  2. #352
    Struggler
    JayDubya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Seen
    11-09-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    17,181

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional [W:167:202:330]

    tl; dr

  3. #353
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,835

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional [W:167:202:330]

    Quote Originally Posted by JayDubya View Post
    tl; dr
    changes nothing
    facts prove your post wrong

    banning abortion factually infringes on a women current legal and human rights, this fact has been proved repeatedly and denying it doenst change it.

    as always if you disagree by all means bring and FACTS to the table that prove otherwise.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  4. #354
    Relentless Thinking Fury
    ChezC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    9,144

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional

    Quote Originally Posted by Lursa View Post
    Your sanctimoniousness is noted. As is the fact that you could not respond with any justification for your overall intolerance for those with differing beliefs and behavior in a country that was built on diversity. And the recognition of the lack of equal rights of the fetus (because you could not offer a rebuttal).

    You are welcome to your beliefs. I hope that you are never in the position to force them on others....and no one is attempting to force abortion on you. (You had no rebuttal for that either.)
    You're entitled to believe anything you wish. Good day...

  5. #355
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,835

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional

    Quote Originally Posted by ChezC3 View Post
    You're entitled to believe anything you wish. Good day...
    its not a belief the fact remains nothing is forced on you and feel free to prove different when every you wish.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  6. #356
    Sporadic insanity normal.


    The Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,754

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional

    Quote Originally Posted by Lursa View Post
    Well, the woman must choose.

    And many do not choose abortion, which seems to go unnoticed here. It one choice....and many do not choose it.
    I know this.

    The choice I spoke of was whether to allow the women to chose - obviously, we have allowed it.
    Education.

    Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller

  7. #357
    Sporadic insanity normal.


    The Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,754

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional

    Quote Originally Posted by JayDubya View Post
    Did you learn English with a dictionary where "basic" meant relying on complete falsehoods?

    Banning abortion does not infringe on anyone's rights.
    Banning abortions infringes on a a woman's right to choose whether she carries a child to term or not.

    Simple as that.
    Education.

    Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller

  8. #358
    Struggler
    JayDubya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Seen
    11-09-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    17,181

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional

    Quote Originally Posted by The Mark View Post
    Banning abortions infringes on a a woman's right to choose whether she carries a child to term or not.

    Simple as that.
    There is no such right, never was, never could be. You have no right to hire someone to kill your kid. You could not have such a right as it violates actual human rights.

    Ergo, banning such an action does not violate anyone's rights. Simple as that.

  9. #359
    Global Moderator
    I'm a Jedi Master, Yo

    CaptainCourtesy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:32 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    152,802

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional

    Quote Originally Posted by ChezC3 View Post
    3. Baiting/Flaming/Trolling - To bait someone in a general sense is to make a comment with a purposeful intent to coerce some form of response from the individual. In some cases this device can be a useful tool of debate, eliciting responses to highlight a point or reveal an underlying truth concerning someone’s argument. However, in other cases the intent of the bait is less focused on debating. “Flamebaiting” is making statements intended to cause an angry or emotional response/flame from the person. Another form of baiting is known as “derailing” or “thread-jacking”. This is deliberate act of making statements with an aim of diverting the topic of a thread significantly from its main focus. These negative forms of baiting constitute a rules violation that can potentially lead to a suspension of posting privileges.

    "Originally, flame meant to carry forth in a passionate manner in the spirit of honorable debate. Flames most often involved the use of flowery language and flaming well was an art form. More recently flame has come to refer to "any kind of derogatory comment no matter how witless or crude."[google] In a forum with sensitive topics such as this, derogatory flaming is bound to happen. Common sense will prevail, yet this is not an invitation to flame. e.g. "You stupid *****ing moron," is completely unacceptable and could lead to a suspension of posting privileges.

    Trolling is a diversionary tactic of those who “deliberately exploit tendencies of human nature or of an online community to upset people” or those “who post inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages” to disrupt normal on-topic discussions. [Wikipedia]. Ignorance, bias, and genuine dissent are not trolling, though at times they may appear similar due to the disingenuous nature of some trolls. Trolling is not allowed and can potentially lead to the suspension of posting privileges.

    4. Don't Be A Jerk (DBAJ) - This simply means what it sounds like.


    I won't warn you again.
    Moderator's Warning:
    Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional [W:167:202:330]Stop the personal attacks, I won't warn you again.
    "Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run

    ====||:-D

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiseone View Post
    This is what I hate about politics the most, it turns people in snobbish egotistical self righteous dicks who allow their political beliefs, partisan attitudes, and 'us vs. them' mentality, to force them to deny reality.

    Quote Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
    You can't paint everone with the same brush.......It does not work tht way.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wessexman View Post
    See with you around Captain we don't even have to make arguments, as you already know everything .
    Quote Originally Posted by CriticalThought View Post
    Had you been born elsewhere or at a different time you may very well have chosen a different belief system.
    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    It a person has faith they dont need to convince another of it, and when a non believer is not interested in listening to the word of the lord, " you shake the dust from your sandels and move on"

  10. #360
    Sporadic insanity normal.


    The Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,754

    Re: Fed judge: Texas abortion limits unconstitutional

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    1.) yes which is nothing like "accept"
    It is a form of acceptance, in my opinion.
    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    2.) and i am the same although morals are meaningless to the situation when it comes to rights
    Morals are the parent of rights. They are anything but meaningless.
    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    3.) no i dont mean the sides like pro-life vs pro choice i mean those extremes views are contradictory to the logic that is used for them typically. Not always but typically.
    ah.
    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    4.) thus negating the factuality
    No. The fact always stands. The context used to interpret it gives it meaning. To someone not aware of the whole, that interpretation can be made to mean something other than what the facts actually represent. That's government and media spin, really.
    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    5.) you brought up law and thats not quite the same as rights
    It is though. Morals/Opinions begat Rights begat Laws. All interconnected.
    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    6.) and thats just it, the extremists and nut balls make it "two sides" but in reality its not
    If not, what?
    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    7.) and there it is, who determines reasonable and where is the force applied.

    now im not disagree, in my system earlier of 21 weeks the same dilemma exists
    Someone has to determine reasonable, and someone will always disagree.

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    8.) agreed agreed agreed

    this is why currently i pick something in the middle that attempts to respect BOTH lives and attempts to grant both lives equality even though its impossible.

    funny thing is though only SOME (certainly not all) members of one side become uncivil and call me evil, despicable, say i should be in jail, im just like hitler and slave owners etc LMAO but nobody takes them seriously anyway
    You seem relatively tame for a evil,jail-worthy, slave-owning, Hitler...
    Education.

    Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller

Page 36 of 48 FirstFirst ... 26343536373846 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •