• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

School shooting this morning . . .

Boo Radley said:
And I said mine isn't, but it's not about beliefs. That's the answer I gave back when you asked that. I thought you were talking about the other one. Fir this one it isn't about beliefs but support. I can find any event where someone need more than seven rounds, but that's a negative and hard to prove, that's why the burden is usually with the positive claim, that you need them. Therefore, not about either of our beliefs.
Click to expand...

Why does a law-abiding citizen have to prove to you that they need more than 7 rounds? What is that you fear?
 
for those who are actually here to learn something


yeah its an advertisement but the facts are correct
Home Invasion: Contemporary Fighting Arts

Many home invasions will have multiple intruders.
38% of all assaults occur during a home invasion.
60% of all reported rapes occur during a home invasion.
1 of every 5 homes will experience a home invasion.
The primary intent behind most home invasions is robbery (i.e., home invasion robbery)
The most common weapons used in home invasions are knives and edged weapons.
Victims are physically injured in 47% of all home invasions.
68% of all home invaders are strangers to their victims.
The most common home invasion entry point is the front door.
 
The Mark said:
Yet he already has, only you didn't accept it because you wanted to troll more.

"I did it because it's funny to watch" is probably somewhere in the definition of trolling...

But I did want to ask...does this mean you agree with him?
Click to expand...

No, I said I did it out of curiosity, but everyone's reaction was fun to watch. Not that I did for their reaction.
 
Boo Radley said:
No, I said I did it out of curiosity, but everyone's reaction was fun to watch. Not that I did for their reaction.
Click to expand...

You don't have a leg to stand on. You have no valid reason to object.
 
TurtleDude said:
for those who are actually here to learn something


yeah its an advertisement but the facts are correct
Home Invasion: Contemporary Fighting Arts

Many home invasions will have multiple intruders.
38% of all assaults occur during a home invasion.
60% of all reported rapes occur during a home invasion.
1 of every 5 homes will experience a home invasion.
The primary intent behind most home invasions is robbery (i.e., home invasion robbery)
The most common weapons used in home invasions are knives and edged weapons.
Victims are physically injured in 47% of all home invasions.
68% of all home invaders are strangers to their victims.
The most common home invasion entry point is the front door.
Click to expand...

But that's nit the issue. The issue us many rounds does it take?
 
Boo Radley said:
But that's nit the issue. The issue us many rounds does it take?
Click to expand...

Like you've been told multiple times, that depends upon the situation.
 
Boo Radley said:
No, I said I did it out of curiosity, but everyone's reaction was fun to watch. Not that I did for their reaction.
Click to expand...
..............
seriously?

That's the lamest attempt to disprove something I've seen in awhile.
 
ChrisL said:
Why does a law-abiding citizen have to prove to you that they need more than 7 rounds? What is that you fear?
Click to expand...

It's not about that. I'm a law abiding citizen, but I have to prove my claims as well.
 
ChrisL said:
Like you've been told multiple times, that depends upon the situation.
Click to expand...

Again, show a situation where it's happened. This should not hard if it's happened.
 
ChrisL said:
You don't have a leg to stand on. You have no valid reason to object.
Click to expand...

sure he does/ People like me don't vote for welfare socialist teacher union supporting lefties. That justifies this sort of nonsense to him
 
Boo Radley said:
It's not about that. I'm a law abiding citizen, but I have to prove my claims as well.
Click to expand...

You haven't proven anything. :rofl Really, if you are trying to win this argument or if you are just trolling, you suck at it either way.
 
The Mark said:
..............
seriously?

That's the lamest attempt to disprove something I've seen in awhile.
Click to expand...

Perhaps, but I've never understood his aversion to answering simple questions. He tends to take them far afield when all he had to was answer it. He either has support or he doesn't
 
Boo Radley said:
Again, show a situation where it's happened. This should not hard if it's happened.
Click to expand...

I don't think such stats exist, but that certainly does not mean the need would never arise. This is why your argument is just silly. Like I said earlier, my chances of breast cancer are low. Does that mean I should never have a mammogram as a preventative measure?
 
TurtleDude said:
MOre dishonesty-you cannot tell until it happens
Click to expand...

But if it's never happened, why would I think it would, and think it so strongly as to say you can't defend yourself without 17 rounds?
 
Boo Radley said:
But if it's never happened, why would I think it would, and think it so strongly as to say you can't defend yourself without 17 rounds?
Click to expand...

more lying-I never said that. I said there is a possibility one would need more than seven rounds

remember, every major police department reached that conclusion

try again you continue to lose
 
ChrisL said:
I don't think such stats exist, but that certainly does not mean the need would never arise. This is why your argument is just silly. Like I said earlier, my chances of breast cancer are low. Does that mean I should never have a mammogram as a preventative measure?
Click to expand...

See that wasn't hard. I don't think it exist either. And while I would never say never, I also would throw out I couldn't defend myself with less than seventeen rounds.

Btw, breast cancer happens. We can show that, which makes the mammogram prudent. If it never happened, it wouldn't.
 
TurtleDude said:
more lying-I never said that. I said there is a possibility one would need more than seven rounds

remember, every major police department reached that conclusion

try again you continue to lose
Click to expand...

Yes you did. And if you continue with that nonsense, I'll find it for you tomorrow. Too many pages to wade through tonight before I go to bed.
 
ChrisL said:
You haven't proven anything. :rofl Really, if you are trying to win this argument or if you are just trolling, you suck at it either way.
Click to expand...

I do on claims I actually make. ;)
 
Boo Radley said:
Yes you did. And if you continue with that nonsense, I'll find it for you tomorrow. Too many pages to wade through tonight before I go to bed.
Click to expand...

the only nonsense is your complete fail. Your dishonest posts are patent here. DO you deny that there is a chance someone might need more than 7 rounds

DID YOU IGNORE THAT HOME INVASION IN NC were there were FOUR invaders and the homeowner killed two.
 
Boo Radley said:
I do on claims I actually make. ;)
Click to expand...

No you don't. you have to establish there is no chance that a citizen might need more than 7 rounds

you cannot
 
TurtleDude said:
the only nonsense is your complete fail. Your dishonest posts are patent here. DO you deny that there is a chance someone might need more than 7 rounds

DID YOU IGNORE THAT HOME INVASION IN NC were there were FOUR invaders and the homeowner killed two.
Click to expand...

Nope. Four, killed two. Did he need more than seven rounds?
 
Boo Radley said:
See that wasn't hard. I don't think it exist either. And while I would never say never, I also would throw out I couldn't defend myself with less than seventeen rounds.

Btw, breast cancer happens. We can show that, which makes the mammogram prudent. If it never happened, it wouldn't.
Click to expand...

Now you are saying you would need at least 17 rounds to defend yourself?

Thank your for admitting that you would never say it would NEVER happen. Just as with preventative medical screening, just because the risks are low does NOT mean you shouldn't take precautions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom