the dishonesty is trying to limit what law abiding people do when you have admitted you cannot provide any reason why such people should be so limited
nothing is hurt by a licensed gun owner or a homeowner in legal possession of a weapon having as many rounds in his weapon as a cop
but if that homeowner is the one case in ten or even a million who needs more than 7 rounds who are you to say he should be handicapped
cut the contrarian idiocy Boo. Your argument is a complete fail. You are just trying to stir up nonsense by insinuating that people are irrational or paranoid to not limit themselves if they are in a gun fight.
and since you claim to be some sort of academic-you ought to be able to google dozens of cases where people had to shoot more than 7 times to end a problem
did you know in Vietnam more than 10K rounds were expended for every casualty inflicted on the enemy?
law enforcement "professionals" have about a 20 percent hit ratio. If there are two attackers that means ten rounds to win the situation
Others claim hit ratios are much higher-62%. But read this article. I know Dave Spaulding I have trained with Dave Spaulding.
How Many Bullets Do You Need in Your Home Defense Handgun? | The Truth About Guns
hmmmm
All the evidence points to the fact that you’ll shoot plenty of bullets in a battle. It follows that more bullets in your home defense handgun is mo’ better. Larger capacity magazines/handguns are more likely to be more effective for home defence than smaller capacity magazines/handguns.