- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Too bad he wasn't elected President, he certainly beats the street thug from Chicago.
Such is leadership, I ran a 200 million dollar a year business taking over from another person. I inherited everything that he did including his numbers. It was my responsibility to accept those numbers and make the better. Every leader inherits something from his/her predecessor and what they do with it determines success or failure. I would have loved to inherit the numbers Bush left but I would have made the better not worse like Obama did but I guess that is the difference between a leader and someone like Obama who has zero leadership skills.
Too bad he wasn't elected President, he certainly beats the street thug from Chicago.
If he was elected, the American people what have to live through a second GOP great recession. We cannot afford to go back to the same failed bush policies that created the Bushian great recession in the first place.
It did take 12 years to recover from the Great Depression. While I don't think it will take that long to recover from the recession, it could if the teaparty is as determined as they've shown to sabotage the economy.It's Bush's fault
it's Bush's fault
its Bush's fault
:roll::roll::roll:
A 1988 dollar is equivalent to $1.98 in 2013.
That means Reagan's increase in debt would be equivalent to $3,335,000,000,000. You are right. Reagan did a swell job standing behind his conservative principles after all. I stand corrected.
vasuderatorrent
because of the conditions he inherited
You're a ****ing idiot.
If he was elected, the American people what have to live through a second GOP great recession. We cannot afford to go back to the same failed bush policies that created the Bushian great recession in the first place.
It's Bush's fault
it's Bush's fault
its Bush's fault
:roll::roll::roll:
It did take 12 years to recover from the Great Depression. While I don't think it will take that long to recover from the recession, it could if the teaparty is as determined as they've shown to sabotage the economy.
It's different when Reagan, Bush and Bush do it. It's only bad when it's a Democrat in office.
So Reagan wasn't responsible for his Presidency, either? I'm starting to notice a trend, here.
This may make your brain hurt so I'll go slow. I'm not even sure why I'm doing this because you are unlikey to actually read it.
CBO's job is to look at the current law and project what the law will cost. So, in 2009 the CBO sat down and said. We expect that result of the policies in place now will generate a 1.2 Trillion dollar deficit. That is the very definition of inhereted. Not that facts matter to you.
I still don't get it. I'd be pretty ashamed if I was caught saying that Bush's recession was Clintons fault but Obama's first deficit was 100% his. Do you even care about being right? I guess that's the difference between us. I strive to be pragmatic, intellecutally honest, and follow the truth wherever it may lead. You spout whatever some tea party talk show host told you to spout.
Froth away, just don't share your koolaide...
What a brilliant response and exactly what I would have expected from a so called progressive. You have no idea what I was saying or meant because you are incapable of thinking at all. Thanks for the personal attack and for those that supported that attack. Shows exactly what kind of people we deal with here daily.
What a brilliant response and exactly what I would have expected from a so called progressive. You have no idea what I was saying or meant because you are incapable of thinking at all. Thanks for the personal attack and for those that supported that attack. Shows exactly what kind of people we deal with here daily.
Always love someone like yourself whining about personal attacks while you yourself are personally attacking someone. Just another reason why your hypocrisy knows no bounds Con.
Show me where I ever called someone else a ****ing idiot?
Obama has almost created more debt than Reagan, Bush, and Bush combined.
I have seen a trend from liberals for a long time, total ignorance and lack of understanding of how to do research so rather than learn how to research a liberal buys what they are told.
Grendel;1062441068]Not as a percentage of debt growth. No one tops Reagan, and Bush did his in an economic upturn, which he turned into a financial meltdown of catastrophic proportions.
That's funny, because the majority of Tea Partiers think Fox News and AM Talk Radio are good sources of information, and colleges and universities are bad sources of information. What did you say about "projecting", again? Because I think there might be a pretty good recursive joke built into it.
Not as a percentage of debt growth. No one tops Reagan, and Bush did his in an economic upturn, which he turned into a financial meltdown of catastrophic proportions.
That's funny, because the majority of Tea Partiers think Fox News and AM Talk Radio are good sources of information, and colleges and universities are bad sources of information. What did you say about "projecting", again? Because I think there might be a pretty good recursive joke built into it.
You're a ****ing idiot.
I guess he likes a challenge. Not too many would say they would like to have inherited the collapsing economy Bush left when he left office.
All Obama and his supporters have done is blame Bush
It's really funny that you keep repeating this, and at the same time blame Democrats for both Bush and Reagan's disasters. And, on top of that, you think other people are the ones projecting.