• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Israel attacks Council of Europe move to restrict male circumcision

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's called circumcision. It is not the same as female mutilation. If you can't see that, your are being obtuse.

It's certainly not quite as gruesome as female genital mutilation, but it's not that far off. Painful consequences can arise, especially if the mohel is performing circumcision in the "traditional" way, in which the foreskin is orally removed by the mohel. Infants have contracted herpes and died because of this practice.

Surely, you can at least agree that circumcision shouldn't be performed in such a filthy and dangerous way.
 
It's called circumcision. It is not the same as female mutilation. If you can't see that, your are being obtuse.

Besides the clitoral hood do you know the other two things they have to remove to make the woman unable to lubricate and lose the same amount of sensitivity as removing the foreskin causes in men? I bet you don't.
 
Not only is there controversy in Europe but recently in the US:

"A coalition of Cleveland Jewish leaders are protesting a graphic mural painted on a gas station wall that depicts a rabbi performing a controversial circumcision ritual.

"Anti-Defamation League regional director Anita Gray, and Cheryl Davis, chair of the Jewish Federation of Cleveland’s Community Relations Committee, slammed the mural as anti-Semitic."

Read more:

[Linke Removed[/url]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not only is there controversy in Europe but recently in the US:

"A coalition of Cleveland Jewish leaders are protesting a graphic mural painted on a gas station wall that depicts a rabbi performing a controversial circumcision ritual.

"Anti-Defamation League regional director Anita Gray, and Cheryl Davis, chair of the Jewish Federation of Cleveland’s Community Relations Committee, slammed the mural as anti-Semitic."

Read more:

[Link Removed]
That is pure antisemitism. Which has nothing to do with the discussion you necro'd.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is pure antisemitism. Which has nothing to do with the discussion you necro'd.
He posted a link to an article, he said nothing anti-Semitic. Your post is pure anti-freedom of speech.
 
He posted a link to an article, he said nothing anti-Semitic. Your post is pure anti-freedom of speech.
I see you do not realize I was speaking to that which he linked to. :doh
Really! Double D'oh! :doh :doh
What he linked to is clearly antisemitism. Which as stated, has nothing to do with the topic he necro'd.
 
I see you do not realize I was speaking to that which he linked to. :doh
Your post clearly indicated that you were angry that he even linked to it.
 
Your post clearly indicated that you were angry that he even linked to it.
You are again seeing that which is not there.
You are on a roll with your assumptions. :lamo
 
He posted a link to an article, he said nothing anti-Semitic. Your post is pure anti-freedom of speech.

He utilized his own freedom of speech.

If you lack the intelligence necessary to understand the concept,that is your problem. The same notion behind the freedom of speech that gives you antiseites the ability to target Jews in every post give others the ability to point out the nature of your hatred.
 
He utilized his own freedom of speech.

If you lack the intelligence necessary to understand the concept,that is your problem. The same notion behind the freedom of speech that gives you antiseites the ability to target Jews in every post give others the ability to point out the nature of your hatred.
No need to insult me on an Internet forum, as I did not initiate a personal insult on anyone in this thread. I have a lot more respect for a man who has the fortitude to insult another man face to face in real life. But I highly doubt it would be wise for a senior citizen to behave in such a manner.
 
No need to insult me on an Internet forum, as I did not initiate a personal insult on anyone in this thread. I have a lot more respect for a man who has the fortitude to insult another man face to face in real life. But I highly doubt it would be wise for a senior citizen to behave in such a manner.

That Arab code of conduct of yours includes veiled threats of violence against those who tell the truth?
 
That Arab code of conduct of yours includes veiled threats of violence against those who tell the truth?
You are an old man in the final stages of life, so I would never do such a thing. I'm just pointing out how cowardly and childish it is to hurl insults on the Internet.
 
You are an old man in the final stages of life, so I would never do such a thing. I'm just pointing out how cowardly and childish it is to hurl insults on the Internet.

You made a stupid statement in post 231. Now, I realize how your people try to silence opposition to your jihad through bullying , threats, and a brand of turnspeak whereby you accuse others of trying to limit free speech lest they dare confront your hatred, but I simply spoke the truth about what freedom of speech is really all about.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Closed and pending mod action.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom