• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reported: Shots Fired at Capitol; Building on Lockdown

That kind of BS is so predictable at some point it has to damage the Democrats' credibility.
 
I was at the Capitol building on July 24th 1998 when that whacko started shooting people.. We had left about 10 minutes from when the shooting occurred because the lines were too long. We went back to our hotel room, turned on the TV and were like 'holy ****.'
 
I don't think the political leanings of
the victim can be judged as the motive.

She was obviously insane.

I think Obama should have to submit to a paternity test.
 
Playing the whiney victim card in record time I see.

Check out Charlie Rangel and Sheila Jackson Lee on this yesterday. These things are so predictable from mindless liberals.
 
Some of you are posting silly comments. She obviously was suffering from a mental disorder post partum depression and perhaps some form of schizoaffective disorder. Whenever you her someone claiming Obama is stalking them you may want to think they aren't all there.
 
Your post was the sexist post.

You implied that because she is a woman that something like this is not posible.

Why would he sex make any difference if she did this or not?

I didn't imply anything of the sort. You are the only person in this thread discussing the idea that her gender was important in any way. Try discussing what I actually wrote instead of what you decided I meant.

I decided she had to be crazy because her actions were crazy. Is that really so difficult for you? Going to keep on this sexism derail?
 
I didn't imply anything of the sort. You are the only person in this thread discussing the idea that her gender was important in any way. Try discussing what I actually wrote instead of what you decided I meant.

I decided she had to be crazy because her actions were crazy. Is that really so difficult for you? Going to keep on this sexism derail?

This is what you wrote

"I kinda feel bad for whichever sharpshooter probably put her down. A car rams the gate at the White House, obviously you have to react as if there's a bomb in it and take them out immediately. Then later you find out is was just some woman who snapped and had her kid with her, who got to watch its mom go crazy and then get shot."

Am I really the only person discussing her gender in any way?

You said she was "just a woman". Why did it matter if she was a woman or a man? Would you feel the same for the shooter if it was just a man who snapped and had his kid with him. I don't think so.

By the way, who said she just snapped?
 
This is what you wrote

"I kinda feel bad for whichever sharpshooter probably put her down. A car rams the gate at the White House, obviously you have to react as if there's a bomb in it and take them out immediately. Then later you find out is was just some woman who snapped and had her kid with her, who got to watch its mom go crazy and then get shot."

Am I really the only person discussing her gender in any way?

You said she was "just a woman". Why did it matter if she was a woman or a man? Would you feel the same for the shooter if it was just a man who snapped and had his kid with him. I don't think so.

By the way, who said she just snapped?
I thought he used the phrase "just some woman" much like, in a similar situation with a man involved, you would say "just some man".


I think you're reading too much into it.

Edit: As in, "damn, it wasn't a bomb, just some woman who apparently went crazy".
 
Back
Top Bottom