In your version, the fact that he thought he was presenting a rationale for rejecting NIH funding not only doesn't make it better but also screams hypocrisy.
If you're suggesting that Reid was speaking to Schumer when he said what he said then that's very very much of a stretch ... your av was always more honest than that.
I was stating that he was going to reiterate what Schumer and Durbin had already said.
"No religion is true, but some religion, any religion, is politically necessary. Law and morality are insufficient for the large majority of men. Obedience to the law and to the morals are insufficient for making men happy. […]Law and morality are therefore in need of being supplemented by divine rewards and punishments."
I missed the press conference you are discussing, so I have read what has been posted, but I am still unclear about one thing that I believe is important. I understand from reading the posts that there was some back and forth semi-related arguing going on, but my question is :did Reid ever answer Bash's direct question about why the Senate wouldn't consider the NIH bill?
There's photoshopping images of politicians they want to demonize:
Then there is the swapping of video footage to push the narrative that the Wisconsis union rally's were violent by showing rally footage from a California rally... No there was no disclaimer saying they did this... it was he palm trees that gave their lie away.
If you want blatant lying other than the ones that happen ever damn day there is this court case where they felt it important to legally win the right to lie.
If you want more evidence just turn on The Five or the morning idiots. They pull stuff right out of their ass and it's generally angry bullcrap they just make up.
So next time any of you Fox News lovers want to say "all media does that..." you have to go dig up this kind of **** I just posted above.