- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
- Messages
- 28,133
- Reaction score
- 15,017
- Location
- Canada's Capital
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'
And? What does this prove?
And? What does this prove?
And? What does this prove?
And? What does this prove?
Jeepers creepers, this is not the argument. Of course millions are spent funding research. That is not my argument.
Once again, like a broken record:
For years, I've read that climate scientists have taken money for research to push foward an agenda created by the donor and not by science itself. Not once has anyone ever offered any evidence of these supposed sinister dealings. NOT ONCE. Yet, unbelievably, it seems that the deniers universally belive this myth. Why do you think that is?
Seimens, a "leader" in Green Tech, funds millions in climate research annually.
And? What does this prove?
The climate scientists like James Hansen have received hundreds of thousands of dollars in awards and speaking fees for advocating government solutions to the problem they are defining (nice work if you can get it!).
And? What does this prove?
Al Gore spends millions annually on climate research expeditions.
And? What does this prove?
Richard Branson spends millions annually on climate research expeditions.
And? What does this prove?
To hear you people talk none of the billions of dollars spent annually on climate research ever goes to a single scientist...
Jeepers creepers, this is not the argument. Of course millions are spent funding research. That is not my argument.
Once again, like a broken record:
For years, I've read that climate scientists have taken money for research to push foward an agenda created by the donor and not by science itself. Not once has anyone ever offered any evidence of these supposed sinister dealings. NOT ONCE. Yet, unbelievably, it seems that the deniers universally belive this myth. Why do you think that is?