Page 7 of 17 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 162

Thread: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'[W;96]

  1. #61
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by j-mac View Post
    Nah, that would be totally wrong....Today wind, and solar make up less than 1% I think of energy use in the US, and the unreliability of these tech's doesn't bode well for the replacement of anything other than turbine free landscapes. Consider an article in the LA Times last December....



    Doesn't sound reliable to me....

    Sounds pretty good to me. In fact, the technology has made leaps and bounds and will continue to improve.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  2. #62
    Professor

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last Seen
    06-21-17 @ 12:55 PM
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    1,577

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Wowza... I is so convinced now!!111!!!1!!1!!1!1!1!!1!!!!!1111!!!!!!!!!111!!!! !!
    If Canada was willing to respect Eisenhower as the Supreme Commander of Allied forces in WWII Europe, I would hope you as a Canadian resident would at least respect a few of his final words as President of the United States enough to not instantly deride them.

  3. #63
    Guru
    Republic Now!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last Seen
    09-12-14 @ 11:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    2,671

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Last I checked, solar power does not cause earthquakes, destroy the land, pump chemicals into the soil, contaminate drinking water, drain rivers, kill wildlife and force people to evacuate their homes.
    I see you've watched some youtube videos. Bravo.




    You need to beef up your knowledge on what has been happening already.
    No, I'm well aware of the paranoid ramblings of many on this issue. They're just not true.
    One who makes himself a worm cannot complain when tread upon.

  4. #64
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by CycloneWanderer View Post
    If Canada was willing to respect Eisenhower as the Supreme Commander of Allied forces in WWII Europe, I would hope you as a Canadian resident would at least respect a few of his final words as President of the United States enough to not instantly deride them.
    Nothing against Eisenhower, but using a quote as proof simply does not cut it. At all.
    Last edited by Middleground; 09-24-13 at 01:14 PM.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  5. #65
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by DDD View Post
    No extra cash that somehow immediately means that money determined to be spent on war, is it? Could it not be spent for something else instead?

    That is why it seemed funny. You who opposed war to the point of wanting Putin to have the Noble Prize instead of Obama suddenly could not think of the extra money being used for anything else other than war.
    My humor and sarcasm really did escape you, but you are forgiven.

  6. #66
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by Republic Now! View Post
    I see you've watched some youtube videos. Bravo.






    No, I'm well aware of the paranoid ramblings of many on this issue. They're just not true.
    Yes, of course. It's all NOT TRUE until it affects you. It's hilarious, actually. We get the same people here when it comes to our tar sands. Heads in the sand ('scuse the play on words!) until the destruction affects them. I don't get why it's so hard to think out of the box, but it seems it's a problem for some.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  7. #67
    Guru
    Republic Now!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last Seen
    09-12-14 @ 11:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    2,671

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Yes, of course. It's all NOT TRUE until it affects you. It's hilarious, actually. We get the same people here when it comes to our tar sands. Heads in the sand ('scuse the play on words!) until the destruction affects them. I don't get why it's so hard to think out of the box, but it seems it's a problem for some.
    Yeah, yeah. Any crazy paranoia that is ever conceived about imagined environmental impact is true and any denial of it is caused by a lack of impact on the individual.
    One who makes himself a worm cannot complain when tread upon.

  8. #68
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by Republic Now! View Post
    Yeah, yeah. Any crazy paranoia that is ever conceived about imagined environmental impact is true and any denial of it is caused by a lack of impact on the individual.
    DDT?
    True

    Ozone layer?
    True

    Polluted rivers?
    True


    Need I continue? If awareness of the above was not raised by environmentalists in the 70s, what do you think the repercussions would be today?
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  9. #69
    Guru
    Republic Now!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last Seen
    09-12-14 @ 11:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    2,671

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    DDT?
    True
    No, DDT was overreacted to and was banned when it didn't need to be. Like most things of the era, DDT was being overused in ways that would obviously impact the environment negatively. Limited and proper use, however, can be largely beneficial.

    We can thank DDT's short term use for the lack of malaria in modern day.


    Ozone layer?
    True
    Are you talking about CFCs?

    CFC's problems were well documented chemical reactions.


    Polluted rivers?
    True
    I don't know what specifically you're talking about here.


    Need I continue? If awareness of the above was not raised by environmentalists in the 70s, what do you think the repercussions would be today?
    Overpopulation?
    False.

    Polar Bears?
    False.

    Offshore Drilling in California?
    False.

    Need I continue?

    Though, I feel this conversation is not productive. How about giving me an example of water seepage in drinking water via horizontal drilling so we can discuss something tangible instead of throwing irrelevant topics back and forth?
    One who makes himself a worm cannot complain when tread upon.

  10. #70
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: U.N. Panel to blame mankind for global warming, explain 'hiatus'

    Quote Originally Posted by Republic Now! View Post
    No, DDT was overreacted to and was banned when it didn't need to be. Like most things of the era, DDT was being overused in ways that would obviously impact the environment negatively. Limited and proper use, however, can be largely beneficial.

    We can thank DDT's short term use for the lack of malaria in modern day.




    Are you talking about CFCs?

    CFC's problems were well documented chemical reactions.




    I don't know what specifically you're talking about here.




    Overpopulation?
    False.

    Polar Bears?
    False.

    Offshore Drilling in California?
    False.

    Need I continue?

    Though, I feel this conversation is not productive. How about giving me an example of water seepage in drinking water via horizontal drilling so we can discuss something tangible instead of throwing irrelevant topics back and forth?
    You lack of knowledge of the facts is quite apparent. You really need to educate yourself.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

Page 7 of 17 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •