• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Quinn: I’d Consider Using National Guard, State Police To Help Chicago

MMC said:
Yeah, well the Nation Guard is the US Army and you don't want the US Army in a US City. We were given the scenario a while back with the Movie the Siege with Bruce Willis and Annette Bening with Denzel Washington. It was pretty close to what will take place.

Click to expand...


Do you really think somethin glike that will happen?

Obama has to go back there in a couple of years. Is he going to go back to Chicago with the military on the streets? He will have a say on the matter.
 
call out the Guard
15q2834.jpg

hah now ain't that a blatant admission of failure?
Removing the requirement of gun registry actually makes some sense.
 
Hatuey said:
Oh yeah, suicide bombers run amok in Chicago, there are people driving explosive laced trucks into police stations, children are walking up to cruisers with C4 vests - or not.
Click to expand...

Not too damned far off there bro....So in your mind they need to be blowing **** up before you see the conditions, and loss of life that equals other areas of the world? Really?

Let me tell you, if people are killed by crossfire in a gang war, or blown up by a **** head terrorist jihadist, they are still dead.
 
Mason66 said:
Do you really think somethin glike that will happen?
Click to expand...

It could...All the nut jobs on the streets now stirring up the class warfare, and pissing and moaning about their free stuff, and free ride possibly coming to an end, and you see what happens.

Obama has to go back there in a couple of years. Is he going to go back to Chicago with the military on the streets? He will have a say on the matter.
Click to expand...

He's not going to Chicago dude...He'll be in Hawaii...He was only ever in Chicago for the political benefit.
 
j-mac said:
Not too damned far off there bro....So in your mind they need to be blowing **** up before you see the conditions, and loss of life that equals other areas of the world?
Click to expand...

Here is what you said:

j-mac said:
Chicago is as bad or worse than Kabul.
Click to expand...

Now, Kabul is 1) in an actual war zone (Afghanistan) 2) having regularly scheduled suicide bombings and 3) full of terrorists. It was YOU who made the comparison that Chicago was AS BAD if not worse than Kabul. Now, I did some research and the death toll for coalitions forces in 2012 alone was 402. Civilians? 4,430 by the 1st half of 2012. If you consider Chicago's death toll of 500 to be anywhere near the ballpark of Kabul, please by all means - show us how? But I have a feeling you'll find your comparison was from the onset, complete nonsense.

However, don't be ashamed, in my research of the basic stats for each place's death toll I found out where you got your comparison from:

Chicago murders top Afghanistan death toll

How cute that you'd be parroting a blatantly dishonest claim by WorldNutDaily. Comparing civilian deaths in Chicago to military deaths in Afghanistan and excluding Afghanistan civilian deaths? I guess that works if you want to make Afghanistan seem like less of a **** up, Chicago like some sort of wasteland and yourself like some sort of authority on dishonest hyperbole.
 
Hatuey said:
Here is what you said:



Now, Kabul is 1) in an actual war zone (Afghanistan) 2) having regularly scheduled suicide bombings and 3) full of terrorists. It was YOU who made the comparison that Chicago was AS BAD if not worse than Kabul. Now, I did some research and the death toll for coalitions forces in 2012 alone was 402. Civilians? 4,430 by the 1st half of 2012. If you consider Chicago's death toll of 500 to be anywhere near the ballpark of Kabul, please by all means - show us how? But I have a feeling you'll find your comparison was from the onset, complete nonsense.

However, don't be ashamed, in my research of the basic stats for each place's death toll I found out where you got your comparison from:

Chicago murders top Afghanistan death toll

How cute that you'd be parroting a blatantly dishonest claim by WorldNutDaily. Comparing civilian deaths in Chicago to military deaths in Afghanistan and excluding Afghanistan civilian deaths? I guess that works if you want to make Afghanistan seem like less of a **** up, Chicago like some sort of wasteland and yourself like some sort of authority on dishonest hyperbole.
Click to expand...

:lamo This is like the pot calling the kettle black isn't it...:lamo The fact is that civilian deaths to civilian deaths Kabul is better off than Chicago...That's just a fact...Calling a site on the internet a name designed to rile me somehow (even though I don't even read their site) is just as laughable....
 
j-mac said:
It could...All the nut jobs on the streets now stirring up the class warfare, and pissing and moaning about their free stuff, and free ride possibly coming to an end, and you see what happens.



He's not going to Chicago dude...He'll be in Hawaii...He was only ever in Chicago for the political benefit.
Click to expand...

That may be true, but his wife is from Chicago and we know who wears the pants in that family.
 
j-mac said:
:lamo This is like the pot calling the kettle black isn't it...:lamo The fact is that civilian deaths to civilian deaths Kabul is better off than Chicago...That's just a fact...Calling a site on the internet a name designed to rile me somehow (even though I don't even read their site) is just as laughable....
Click to expand...

Civilian deaths to civilian deaths? Kabul had 4,000 civilian deaths last year with Chicago at 500 civilian deaths. So that begs the question:

IN WHAT UNIVERSE is Chicago having 1/8th of Kabul's death toll somehow worse?

Oh J-mac, I do love debating you. Whenever your assertions are proven to be untrue, and your false claims are sourced and exposed as intellectually weak, you revert to victim-hood. Now that we've completely destroyed your assertion that Chicago is AS BAD IF NOT WORSE THAN KABUL, do you have any other false claims you'd like to have debunked?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom