• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tom DeLay money laundering verdict overturned

humbolt said:
By the same measure, we can attribute the lights in your house to the first person to use a candle.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily. Lifeline was a Reagan program. The fact that it has continued under successor presidents does not mean that it's no longer a Reagan program.

But I will accept your logic on candles that I occasionally use.
 
Grant said:
Actually no one calls them Reaganophones. You should stop and think before you edit someone else's post.
Click to expand...

How is that relevant? The program people attribute to Obama is actually attributable to Reagan. Just because ignorant Democrat voters and dishonest Republican hacks call it Obamaphones doesn't make it so.

You should stop and think before you comment to another poster who has demonstrated vastly superior knowledge of virtually every topic compared to you.
 
obvious Child said:
How is that relevant? The program people attribute to Obama is actually attributable to Reagan. Just because ignorant Democrat voters and dishonest Republican hacks call it Obamaphones doesn't make it so.
Click to expand...

If people call it an Obamaphone that is what it is. And are there any Democrat voters who aren't ignorant?
You should stop and think before you comment to another poster who has demonstrated vastly superior knowledge of virtually every topic compared to you.
Click to expand...

That has yet to be demonstrated.
 
Grant said:
If people call it an Obamaphone that is what it is. And are there any Democrat voters who aren't ignorant?
Click to expand...

If I call a pig a panda, does that make a pig a panda? What kind of asinine logic is that? That things are whatever people call them? By your argument, a toliteraian state run by a dictator who calls the nation a "free democratic society" is thereby a Free Democratic Society merely because he said so.

That's idiotic. Even for this place. But that's exactly what you are arguing.

That has yet to be demonstrated.
Click to expand...

On the contrary, you run away from my rebuttals constantly. Remember that Clinton non-profit thread? Massively superior knowledge compared to you.
 
obvious Child said:
If I call a pig a panda, does that make a pig a panda? What kind of asinine logic is that? That things are whatever people call them? By your argument, a toliteraian state run by a dictator who calls the nation a "free democratic society" is thereby a Free Democratic Society merely because he said so.
Click to expand...

If you were calling a pig a panda you would be the only one doing so. But everyone calls an Obamaphone an Obamaphone. You might have your own terms for different animals and objects but it's clear that no one else agrees with you. I even provided the links. But if people are calling Obamaphones Reaganophones, please provide the links. Most people wouldn'y have any idea what uyou are talking about.

That's idiotic. Even for this place. But that's exactly what you are arguing.
On the contrary, you run away from my rebuttals constantly. Remember that Clinton non-profit thread? Massively superior knowledge compared to you.
Click to expand...

Can't recall anything about a Clinton non-profit thread. Have you doctored my posts there as well?
 
Grant said:
If you were calling a pig a panda you would be the only one doing so. But everyone calls an Obamaphone an Obamaphone. You might have your own terms for different animals and objects but it's clear that no one else agrees with you. I even provided the links. But if people are calling Obamaphones Reaganophones, please provide the links. Most people wouldn'y have any idea what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

Your argument is "if people call it Y, it's Y, even if it's actually X." Therefore, if I can get enough people to call a pig a panda, under your argument, a pig is now a panda.

Can't recall anything about a Clinton non-profit thread. Have you doctored my posts there as well?
Click to expand...

Fail:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...han-50m-travel-expenses-2.html#post1062213951
 
obvious Child said:
Your argument is "if people call it Y, it's Y, even if it's actually X." Therefore, if I can get enough people to call a pig a panda, under your argument, a pig is now a panda.
Click to expand...

Yes, that would be the case. Etymology (to me) is a fascinating subject and one that is interesting to many. Although you may feel that the meanings of words remain constant over the years that is simply not the case.

That link you sent is familiar, thanks, but I quickly lost interest in debating the Clintons.



Fail:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...han-50m-travel-expenses-2.html#post1062213951[/QUOTE]
 
There is no better example of just how corrupt the US judiciary is. The role of the judiciary is to protect the rotten status quo and those politicians who profit from it. Very sad.
 
Grant said:
Yes, that would be the case. Etymology (to me) is a fascinating subject and one that is interesting to many. Although you may feel that the meanings of words remain constant over the years that is simply not the case.
Click to expand...

Except in this case those who call it Obamaphones are either dishonest or stupid.

So which are you?

The Clinton link is merely proof that I have vastly superior knowledge compared to you.
 
obvious Child said:
Except in this case those who call it Obamaphones are either dishonest or stupid.

So which are you?

The Clinton link is merely proof that I have vastly superior knowledge compared to you.
Click to expand...

Yes, of course, Obvious Child.
 
obvious Child said:
Except in this case those who call it Obamaphones are either dishonest or stupid.

So which are you?

The Clinton link is merely proof that I have vastly superior knowledge compared to you.
Click to expand...

This is debate?
 
Glad this finally got overturned. This was, according to the ruling, a clear case of political assassination using the court system.

Delay I hope sues for damages and gets enough to set himself and his family up for a few generations.
 
Ockham said:
Glad this finally got overturned. This was, according to the ruling, a clear case of political assassination using the court system.

Delay I hope sues for damages and gets enough to set himself and his family up for a few generations.
Click to expand...

The battle cost him $12 mil.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom