- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 34,698
- Reaction score
- 19,179
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
It's not "well known"
In your case surely.
It's not "well known"
Then you must have been misinformed in some other school, .
So ignore Arkansas, got it.
More anti Americanism from Americans. Little wonder that the Party of Stupid People voted for Hope and Change.
Are you from SW Michigan?? This is pathetic and sad.
The same overtures were made by Ahmadinejad repeatedly. Nothing has changed. It was and is a nuclear energy program.
I agree. But given the tensions between nations in the area, especially from Shia vs Sunni conflicts, I really doubt that Iran would pass up the chance to build powerful weapons. Even if their intent is mere deterrence, nuclear weapons are a very attractive thing for a country to have. I do not think that they will use them, and I'm sure that they truly don't want to, but I doubt that they will refrain of obtaining that security.
Keep in mind, I see no reason why Iran with nuclear weapons is a bad thing. It's no worse than Pakistan with them. Certainly not worse than North Korea with them. I think the devastation in 1945 and the fear of global annihilation during the Cold War has taught everyone the consequences of using nuclear weapons. I do not think that any nation would start a nuclear war. It is an act of suicide, not only of oneself, but of one's family, friends, and people. Whoever fires the first nuke may be completely wiped from the map by everyone else. If Kim Jong Il wasn't crazy enough to do that, no one is.
Yes, maybe it was another Bill Clinton joke though the addition of children is a novel twist.If it's OK to insult a whole region of the world, it's OK to imply that all Arkansans are inbred. Red state, by the way. Bunch of regular geniuses, right. (We also voted for Bill Clinton, who's one of them.)And didn't you say this:
So, say whatever about Michigan, but leave the red states alone?
It's not "well known"
If it's OK to insult a whole region of the world, it's OK to imply that all Arkansans are inbred. Red state, by the way. Bunch of regular geniuses, right.
It is to anyone who has followed left wing propaganda.
I would completely agree with you on that. I have always stated and still believe that either everybody has them or nobody has them and preferably, nobody has them. The world has taken the step to destroy all chemical weapons so lets make that step too, so that Einstein's prediction on WW4 don't come true.
A very significant percentage of Muslims living in the middle east and south Asia ARE inbred, though. Since this is not true for those living in Arkansas, this is a false comparison. In Iran, for instance, the consanguinity rate is just below 40%. In Pakistan and most of the Arab world it is higher.
Do you REALLY think that 40 % of marriages in Arkansas are to family members?
Keep in mind, I see no reason why Iran with nuclear weapons is a bad thing. It's no worse than Pakistan with them. Certainly not worse than North Korea with them.
Oh, we'll then that would be why. I just follow right wing propaganda.
It will be another North Korea, generations of darkness for Persians.
All that merely because of a nuclear weapons program? "Generations of darkness"? Really? The Middle East is already trying to fight off the yoke of theocratic rule and fundamentalist Islam. It basically held sway for a single generation. A lot of people throughout the region want to be modern, secular people. Not atheist, but secular. They want modern governments with modern laws, not fanatical attempts to adhere to a book from over a thousand years ago.
All that merely because of a nuclear weapons program? "Generations of darkness"? Really? The Middle East is already trying to fight off the yoke of theocratic rule and fundamentalist Islam. It basically held sway for a single generation. A lot of people throughout the region want to be modern, secular people. Not atheist, but secular. They want modern governments with modern laws, not fanatical attempts to adhere to a book from over a thousand years ago.
All that merely because of a nuclear weapons program? "Generations of darkness"? Really? The Middle East is already trying to fight off the yoke of theocratic rule and fundamentalist Islam. It basically held sway for a single generation. A lot of people throughout the region want to be modern, secular people. Not atheist, but secular. They want modern governments with modern laws, not fanatical attempts to adhere to a book from over a thousand years ago.
We see a fair share of that played out at home, too!
All that merely because of a nuclear weapons program? "Generations of darkness"? Really?
A very significant percentage of Muslims living in the middle east and south Asia ARE inbred, though. Since this is not true for those living in Arkansas, this is a false comparison. In Iran, for instance, the consanguinity rate is just below 40%. In Pakistan and most of the Arab world it is higher.
Do you REALLY think that 40 % of marriages in Arkansas are to family members?
See Rocket, criticising any US crimes is to be an anti-American. It's not possible that you may just like to see the crimes end.