Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 50

Thread: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

  1. #21
    Sage
    roguenuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Last Seen
    12-22-17 @ 12:44 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    29,154

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    I didn't equate anything. You were the one who said this was "the first step to equality"

    I asked you where you draw the line. If "consenting adults" is the only criteria you need to determine your morality, then that's all you needed to say. In some Muslim cultures pedophilia is acceptable and practiced. If someone doesn't agree with that does that mean they hate Muslims?
    Like it has always been, it is about the rational reasoning behind why laws are in place. There can be rational reasons given for why those things you mentioned are prevented by law in a way where it can be shown how such laws further legitimate state interests of some kind (in most cases, otherwise you are discussing things that will change as they should). There is no legitimate state interest being furthered by legally preventing two people of the same sex from entering into a legal marriage.
    "A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt

    Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.

  2. #22
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,986
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    I didn't equate anything. You were the one who said this was "the first step to equality"

    I asked you where you draw the line. If "consenting adults" is the only criteria you need to determine your morality, then that's all you needed to say. In some Muslim cultures pedophilia is acceptable and practiced. If someone doesn't agree with that does that mean they hate Muslims?
    This is my last reply to the foolishness you have been spewing. You aren't interested in anything except spreading your message of intolerance and bigotry, and I'm not going to play your game.

  3. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by roguenuke View Post
    Like it has always been, it is about the rational reasoning behind why laws are in place. There can be rational reasons given for why those things you mentioned are prevented by law in a way where it can be shown how such laws further legitimate state interests of some kind (in most cases, otherwise you are discussing things that will change as they should). There is no legitimate state interest being furthered by legally preventing two people of the same sex from entering into a legal marriage.
    Homosexual sex isn't rational however

    It is not genetic. Animals do it in the wild for irrational reasons, dominance, confused stimuli. We don't create laws based upon irrational behavior. There is no homosexual instinct in animals to mate. If homosexual was natural and normal we would see genetic proof. There isn't any. We'd have seen Evolution adapt to the behavior and find a purpose for it. There is no purpose for it. It's jamming things in dirty places.

    There is no social or economic purpose to Gay "Marriage". It's pointless/pretend/sham marriage

  4. #24
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:39 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    45,429

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    1.)So who is next in line?
    2.)Muslim pedophiles?
    3.) Transgendered homosexuals?
    4.) Unisex bathrooms? Father/adult son marriages? Polygamy?
    5.) Where does it stop?
    1.) theres not sole precedence used in court for equal rights for gays to lend them to anything else, so this question is moot and has nothing to do with equal rights for gays.
    2.) no we will never be allowing rape since that violates rights, so this question is moot and has nothing to do with equal rights for gays.
    3.) you using this adj just further shows how severely uneducated on these topics you are, so this question is moot and has nothing to do with equal rights for gays.
    4.) these existed before i was born so this question is moot and has nothing to do with equal rights for gays.
    5.) at equal rights for gays

    destroying your posts is pretty easy, let us know when you have anything factual or that even relates to this topic.
    thanks for playing, next.
    Quote Originally Posted by RamFel View Post
    Genetically human & human being is exactly the same thing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hicup View Post
    homosexuality is objectively wrong, but because science tells me it is, not politics.
    Quote Originally Posted by calamity View Post
    I'm not at risk for AIDS. Gays are.
    Quote Originally Posted by ajn678 View Post
    there is no such thing as an abortion on a dead fetus.

  5. #25
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:39 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    45,429

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by DiAnna View Post
    This is my last reply to the foolishness you have been spewing. You aren't interested in anything except spreading your message of intolerance and bigotry, and I'm not going to play your game.
    it doesnt spread though, he just posts his lies and opinions based on bigotry and hate and as they pop up we just smack them like a game of whack-a-mole.
    Quote Originally Posted by RamFel View Post
    Genetically human & human being is exactly the same thing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hicup View Post
    homosexuality is objectively wrong, but because science tells me it is, not politics.
    Quote Originally Posted by calamity View Post
    I'm not at risk for AIDS. Gays are.
    Quote Originally Posted by ajn678 View Post
    there is no such thing as an abortion on a dead fetus.

  6. #26
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:39 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    45,429

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    Homosexual sex isn't rational however

    It is not genetic. Animals do it in the wild for irrational reasons, dominance, confused stimuli. We don't create laws based upon irrational behavior. There is no homosexual instinct in animals to mate. If homosexual was natural and normal we would see genetic proof. There isn't any. We'd have seen Evolution adapt to the behavior and find a purpose for it. There is no purpose for it. It's jamming things in dirty places.

    There is no social or economic purpose to Gay "Marriage". It's pointless/pretend/sham marriage
    this is very entertaining, facts disagree with you though

    facts are like kryptonite to your posts

    do you have something else other than posting lies?
    anything that doesnt get destroyed?
    Quote Originally Posted by RamFel View Post
    Genetically human & human being is exactly the same thing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hicup View Post
    homosexuality is objectively wrong, but because science tells me it is, not politics.
    Quote Originally Posted by calamity View Post
    I'm not at risk for AIDS. Gays are.
    Quote Originally Posted by ajn678 View Post
    there is no such thing as an abortion on a dead fetus.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    1.) theres not sole precedence used in court for equal rights for gays to lend them to anything else, so this question is moot and has nothing to do with equal rights for gays.
    2.) no we will never be allowing rape since that violates rights, so this question is moot and has nothing to do with equal rights for gays.
    3.) you using this adj just further shows how severely uneducated on these topics you are, so this question is moot and has nothing to do with equal rights for gays.
    4.) these existed before i was born so this question is moot and has nothing to do with equal rights for gays.
    5.) at equal rights for gays

    destroying your posts is pretty easy, let us know when you have anything factual or that even relates to this topic.
    thanks for playing, next.
    Where do you personally draw the line?

    Does it stop with gays or who else gets to redefine what marriage means too?

    We keep having the same conversation endlessly in these Gay Thumper threads. So I'm trying to just know out of curiosity where you draw the line

  8. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    this is very entertaining, facts disagree with you though

    facts are like kryptonite to your posts

    do you have something else other than posting lies?
    anything that doesnt get destroyed?
    I understand you being Reverend Gay Thumper around here this is a very emotional issue for you

  9. #29
    Sage
    roguenuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Last Seen
    12-22-17 @ 12:44 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    29,154

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    Homosexual sex isn't rational however

    It is not genetic. Animals do it in the wild for irrational reasons, dominance, confused stimuli. We don't create laws based upon irrational behavior. There is no homosexual instinct in animals to mate. If homosexual was natural and normal we would see genetic proof. There isn't any. We'd have seen Evolution adapt to the behavior and find a purpose for it. There is no purpose for it. It's jamming things in dirty places.

    There is no social or economic purpose to Gay "Marriage". It's pointless/pretend/sham marriage
    It is just as rational as any other sex. It is sex, most of which is not about procreation, but is rather about social bonding. Sex between same sex persons fulfills that social bonding aspect of sex for those couples the exact same way that sex does when it is opposite sex couples.

    Most of this is absolutely nothing but your opinion. No facts, and certainly no proof of this. In fact, the entire last "paragraph" is easily refuted by sociological and economic studies.
    "A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt

    Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.

  10. #30
    Sage
    Boo Radley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    11-22-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    36,858

    Re: Labor Dept.: Same-Sex Spouses Have Benefit Rights

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    Where do you personally draw the line?

    Does it stop with gays or who else gets to redefine what marriage means too?

    We keep having the same conversation endlessly in these Gay Thumper threads. So I'm trying to just know out of curiosity where you draw the line
    How about anyone there is no just cause to say no to? Quit trying to side step that you have no just cause to deny equal rights.

    AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •