• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man who plotted to kill and eat children gets more than 26 years in prison

You do realize he was caught with child porn right? Hardly "thought" conviction.

And he was punished for it. He got what was coming to him. He's not walking the streets. He's in jail. What was being proposed in the OP was that he wasn't punished enough and you can't punish someone for crimes they thought of.
 
And he was punished for it. He got what was coming to him. He's not walking the streets. He's in jail. What was being proposed in the OP was that he wasn't punished enough and you can't punish someone for crimes they thought of.

I don't think he was punished enough for the child porn.
 
Just send him to Texas. We'll handle it.

That's one of the great things about Texans. They are all business and they do things in an expedient manner. Shame it's so damn hot there all the time or I would have moved there already. Texas should annex NY so we get the great New England weather but without having morons like Weiner or Bloomberg for politicians. We need some Bush family members to come up here and clean things up.
 
How is possessing child porn harming someone? Again, I understand how making child porn harms children, but possessing it doesn't harm anyone. Why is possession illegal?

If you feel the need to support those who get sexually excited by watching children having sex, then you must have some dog in the hunt here. And if that is the case, I really feel the best thing you can do is contact your psychiatrist or call the SVU in your local city before a child suffers.
 
I don't think he was punished enough for the child porn.


Let's just hope the other prisoners in general population take care of business for the greater good. Typically they do. Chances are this guy won't make it much longer than Dahmer did.
 
Because somebody was harmed in the making of that product. The demand created the supply, which created the harm.

It scares me that we even have to explain this to the poster. I can pretty much guarantee he has skin in this game. Sad, actually.
 
If you feel the need to support those who get sexually excited by watching children having sex, then you must have some dog in the hunt here. And if that is the case, I really feel the best thing you can do is contact your psychiatrist or call the SVU in your local city before a child suffers.

:roll:

Just because I question a law doesn't mean I support whatever the law is acting on.
 
That's one of the great things about Texans. They are all business and they do things in an expedient manner. Shame it's so damn hot there all the time or I would have moved there already. Texas should annex NY so we get the great New England weather but without having morons like Weiner or Bloomberg for politicians. We need some Bush family members to come up here and clean things up.

I'll make a call and see what I can do.

LOL
 
Just tough talk. That's what I thought. There's nothing any state could do much beyond what was done to him.

You're wrong, and that's why we're us, and you're just you.
 
So if a product that you demand turns out to cause harm to people in the making of the product you should be arrested for possessing the product even if possession of the product harms no one. That's bull****.

"Turns out to" cause harm? Turns out to? What, like there's any ****ing ambiguity about whether harm was caused in the making of child porn? No. Not a correct statement. Knowingly purchasing a product that you know for a fact that someone was harmed in the making of it.
 
"Turns out to" cause harm? Turns out to? What, like there's any ****ing ambiguity about whether harm was caused in the making of child porn? No. Not a correct statement. Knowingly purchasing a product that you know for a fact that someone was harmed in the making of it.

What if I buy a product that I know for a fact was made with child labor? Should I be held accountable for providing these assholes business?
 
What if I buy a product that I know for a fact was made with child labor? Should I be held accountable for providing these assholes business?

Child labour does not always equal to child abuse. Please learn the difference. It would bring you back to reality.
 
Child labour does not always equal to child abuse. Please learn the difference. It would bring you back to reality.

Fair enough. Ok, I will revise my statement. If you know it's produced with child labor that equates to child abuse should you be held accountable for providing them business.
 
Fair enough. Ok, I will revise my statement. If you know it's produced with child labor that equates to child abuse should you be held accountable for providing them business.

Here's how I measure it: Considering a kid can't consent to sexual activity until they're around 16-17 in most states, child pornography is without a single shroud of a doubt, child abuse. Anybody taking part in its distribution, purchase etc, is guilty of an illegal activity.
 
Fair enough. Ok, I will revise my statement. If you know it's produced with child labor that equates to child abuse should you be held accountable for providing them business.

At the end of the day you answer to one person, and hopefully the harshest judge of your decisions. It's the guy you look at in the mirror when you are shaving. If you are cool with profiting off slaves then nothing on some forum is gonna change that. If you are appalled by slavery and want nothing to do with it, then equally nothing on this forum is gonna change that. Personally, I don't buy stuff that I even think was made by children slaves, let alone KNOW was made by them. In fact, when at all humanly possible I buy American.
 
What if I buy a product that I know for a fact was made with child labor? Should I be held accountable for providing these assholes business?

Yet again Henrin, which you still don't understand. The continued distribution of the child porn HARMS the child and continues the ILLEGAL exploitation of that child. Not sure how you cannot understand this.
 
At the end of the day you answer to one person, and hopefully the harshest judge of your decisions. It's the guy you look at in the mirror when you are shaving. If you are cool with profiting off slaves then nothing on some forum is gonna change that. If you are appalled by slavery and want nothing to do with it, then equally nothing on this forum is gonna change that. Personally, I don't buy stuff that I even think was made by children slaves, let alone KNOW was made by them. In fact, when at all humanly possible I buy American.

What "stuff" is made by child slave labor? Or even child labor, which is just as bad as children should be in school instead of working (for any amount of compensation.)

If this is common knowledge, then why is this stuff sold in the USA?
 
Yet again Henrin, which you still don't understand. The continued distribution of the child porn HARMS the child and continues the ILLEGAL exploitation of that child. Not sure how you cannot understand this.

Everyone doesn't seem to understand that I have been pretending to be ignorant the entire time to see if people could justify the law. As your argument here, the person in question is not distributing the material, but simply the individual that received what has been distributed. Since the individual in question was not a distributor your argument here doesn't seem to be relevant.
 
Since the individual in question was not a distributor your argument here doesn't seem to be relevant.

The act of possessing the child porn causes harm to the child and continues the ILLEGAL exploitation of that child. It is QUITE RELEVANT. The fact you are defending the act of possessing child pornography says lots about you though.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1062343453 said:
What "stuff" is made by child slave labor? Or even child labor, which is just as bad as children should be in school instead of working (for any amount of compensation.)

If this is common knowledge, then why is this stuff sold in the USA?

USA doesn't have jurisdiction over the work rules in other countries. But anyone with access to Google should know what companies use children / slave labor and then ship their goods to USA. The garment sector of the retail industry is one of the worst, as are textiles. Go to the results page of this Dept of Labor report. It's pretty disgusting. Child porn is page 22.

http://www.dol.gov/ilab/programs/ocft/pdf/2010TVPRA.pdf
 
Back
Top Bottom