- Joined
- Nov 11, 2011
- Messages
- 12,895
- Reaction score
- 2,909
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
GUN CONTROL has not been effective in stopping violent crimes. INCREASING SENTENCES has been shown to be effective in other places.
I have pointed out why this is a distinction without a difference a few times already. Ignoring that doesn't make that problem just disappear
In THIS country, gun control laws without enforcement have been shown to be ineffective.
Well, among other things, yes, weak legislation is pretty much worthless
And yet, a whole group of mindless morons advocate for more of the same. More gun laws meant to target law abiding citizens. When it comes to actually targeting the violent criminals? Crickets.
In like my last five posts I have been clear that I support increased penalties ....
See...I think you are full of **** personally.
So, unlike me, you don't support increased penalties?
I think you cant come right and say what you mean because at the end of the day, you are no different than tres goofus.
I just did explain exactly what I meant:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...s-navy-yard-w-69-700-a-67.html#post1062333172
it was actually a response to a question you asked and a post you even quoted. So surely you didn't miss it and can only assume that you are in fact fundamentally confused.
You want more inane ineffective gun laws passed knowing full well they will never impact criminals...only law abiding citizens.
So what exactly are you taking issue with, my support for harsher penalties or ending the lax oversight in P2P sales?