Page 12 of 25 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 241

Thread: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

  1. #111
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    bs...
    OK prove me wrong......

    Yes, some people qualified for communications subsidies for a while now (progressive idea of course) however, people are getting free ****ing cell phones presently under the stimulus er "new CRA."




  2. #112
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:42 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    89,748

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    No she wasn't.....

    What is factually correct is that progressives don't care about issues unless they're activists or don't financially gain from casting a vote...

    DWS is never correct because she is as partisan as you can get..... She has an ego the size of the Sun - hence her excuses for the progressives failed attempts at tyrannical "gun control."
    In an earlier post, 92 - I presented her statements and evidence that she was factually correct about the mail in ballots issue and the reliance Colorado voters have on them.

    Not one person here has provided any verifiable evidence otherwise. Not one.
    __________________________________________________ _
    There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers

  3. #113
    Be different, be honest
    EdwinWillers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Divided States of Kardashia
    Last Seen
    12-25-15 @ 04:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,361

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by haymarket View Post
    In an earlier post, 92 - I presented her statements and evidence that she was factually correct about the mail in ballots issue and the reliance Colorado voters have on them.

    Not one person here has provided any verifiable evidence otherwise. Not one.
    No, you merely opined some silly, baseless assertions to which no one found it remotely worth bothering to comment - save me - and that to say "Wow" .
    Who chimes "No Absolutes!" chimes absolutely.

    zoom zoom

  4. #114
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    [QUOTE=Mr.Nick;1062323871]OK prove me wrong......

    Yes, some people qualified for communications subsidies for a while now (progressive idea of course) however, people are getting free ****ing cell phones presently under the stimulus er "new CRA."

    That's easy, another James O'Keefe phony video.


  5. #115
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:42 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    89,748

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by EdwinWillers View Post
    No, you merely opined some silly, baseless assertions to which no one found it remotely worth bothering to comment.
    By your own terms - you just included yourself as NO ONE. Well done!

    And you need to find out the difference between fact and opinion. The FACT that mail in ballots were not allowed in this recall election is beyond dispute. And that is what Wasserman contended and she has been proven right.

    Now this is the part where you either apologize or present the verifiable evidence that she was incorrect in her statement.

    Yeah..... I know .... fat chance.

    After the OP it took only a single post from Grim to turn it into a hate fueled vitriolic poisonous right wing attack festival with Wasserman as its target. .
    __________________________________________________ _
    There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers

  6. #116
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by haymarket View Post
    In an earlier post, 92 - I presented her statements and evidence that she was factually correct about the mail in ballots issue and the reliance Colorado voters have on them.

    Not one person here has provided any verifiable evidence otherwise. Not one.
    That isn't "voter suppression" tho.....

    DWS said the majority of of COL voters relied on mail in ballots and that is not true at all........These clowns got overwhelmingly recalled..... Counting the "rural areas" wouldn't have mattered considering if every vote came in for the recalled they still would have been recalled regardless...

    The best part is that the majority of those who live in rural areas rely on guns to eat and for protection.....

    Hell, during a general election or even midterm election states can be called with only 10% of the votes in.......

    There was no suppression whatsoever........

  7. #117
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:42 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    89,748

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    That isn't "voter suppression" tho.....

    DWS said the majority of of COL voters relied on mail in ballots and that is not true at all......

    The article I linked to gave a figure of 70% or more. Here is a different article in advance of the election which confirms those high figures

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...anges-dynamic/

    Democratic Senate President John Morse, one of the lawmakers facing a recall, said there's an expectation from some voters that they'll get a ballot by mail because that's what they're used to. In November, about 74 percent of Colorado voters cast their ballot by mail.
    "They're going to wait for it and it's never going to come, and they're not going to get a chance to vote," Morse said Friday. "I think it's bad for everybody.
    In Morse's Colorado Springs district, 61.4 percent voted with a mail ballot in 2010, the year he won re-election by a margin of a few hundred votes. In the district of Pueblo Sen. Angela Giron, the other lawmaker facing a recall, 65.9 percent voted with a mail ballot that same year.
    Last edited by haymarket; 09-17-13 at 12:05 AM.
    __________________________________________________ _
    There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers

  8. #118
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by haymarket View Post
    The article I linked to gave a figure of 70% or more.
    And that is a blatant lie, pure speculation or an assertion that could also read: "70% of the STATE of Colorado relies on mail in ballots" - meaning that 70% of the state is rural in which in fact would be absolutely true - just not via population.....

  9. #119
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:42 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    89,748

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    And that is a blatant lie, pure speculation or an assertion that could also read "70% of the STATE of Colorado relies on mail in ballots" - meaning that 70% of the state is rural - which would in fact be absolutely true - just not via population.....
    I provided a second article with similar statistics.

    If you have something in the way of evidence to provide other than vitriol and rhetoric, I would be glad to read it.
    __________________________________________________ _
    There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers

  10. #120
    Be different, be honest
    EdwinWillers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Divided States of Kardashia
    Last Seen
    12-25-15 @ 04:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,361

    Re: Debbie Wasserman Schultz on COL recall: 'Voter Suppression, Pure and Simple’

    Quote Originally Posted by haymarket View Post
    By your own terms - you just included yourself as NO ONE. Well done!

    And you need to find out the difference between fact and opinion. The FACT that mail in ballots were not allowed in this recall election is beyond dispute. And that is what Wasserman contended and she has been proven right.

    Now this is the part where you either apologize or present the verifiable evidence that she was incorrect in her statement.

    Yeah..... I know .... fat chance.

    After the OP it took only a single post from Grim to turn it into a hate fueled vitriolic poisonous right wing attack festival with Wasserman as its target. .
    Blah blah blah blah

    Careful, keep it up and you'll sound just like ole' blabbermouth schultzie herself - who deserves every bucket of vitriol she begs.
    Who chimes "No Absolutes!" chimes absolutely.

    zoom zoom

Page 12 of 25 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •