• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Activists: Syrian Rebels take Christian Village

If your advocating an attack on president Assad you are supporting the rebels. The US has been training, arming and giving other material support to the Islamic extremist insurgents (rebels as you guys like to call them when your on their side, and as I referred to them when your not) since the beginning, helping them in their attempt to overthrow president Assad. That's what you desire as well, right?

Tell you what son, when you can actually read what I write, you'll answer all your questions. It must be pretty cool living in the black and white world you live it, while in reality it's all grey. I don't support EITHER side punk.
 
Tell you what son, when you can actually read what I write, you'll answer all your questions. It must be pretty cool living in the black and white world you live it, while in reality it's all grey. I don't support EITHER side punk.

Another Internet tough guy, oh my. So do you mean to say now that you're not in favor of a US attack on president Assad's government?
 
Another Internet tough guy, oh my. So do you mean to say now that you're not in favor of a US attack on president Assad's government?

Again, read what I have written. Do you need it spoonfed to you?
 
We all have read your writings, rebels good, Assad bad, got it.
 
We all have read your writings, rebels good, Assad bad, got it.

As usual, you fail. Please show me where I said rebels good, Assad bad. Are lies all you have left since you can't back anything up with quotes son?
 
As usual, you fail. Please show me where I said rebels good, Assad bad. Are lies all you have left since you can't back anything up with quotes son?


Do you support a US attack on president Assad or not?
 
Do you support a US attack on president Assad or not?

He's too scared to answer because he knows he's on the side of children getting beheaded and women getting raped, and the elderly being burned to death. That's the side he's on and that's why he won't answer.
 
He's too scared to answer because he knows he's on the side of children getting beheaded and women getting raped, and the elderly being burned to death. That's the side he's on and that's why he won't answer.
There's a side for that, all three? I figured two of out of three was the very best I could do. Do they take VISA?
 
There's a side for that, all three? I figured two of out of three was the very best I could do. Do they take VISA?

Well if you want the thrill of ruthless bloodthirsty slaughter you can join in on the Syrian Rebels, Obama will ensure that you get whatever training you need. Obama will ensure that you're properly compensated.
 
Well if you want the thrill of ruthless bloodthirsty slaughter you can join in on the Syrian Rebels, Obama will ensure that you get whatever training you need. Obama will ensure that you're properly compensated.
Bloodthirsty slaughter is its own compensation, obviously.
 
Well if you want the thrill of ruthless bloodthirsty slaughter you can join in on the Syrian Rebels, Obama will ensure that you get whatever training you need. Obama will ensure that you're properly compensated.

it's early here so excuse my bluntness but what the **** are you talking about? Bloodthirsty slaughter has been the story in Syria for the past 2 years and the main culprit has been the better equipped, highly funded and strongly supported Assad regime.
 
it's early here so excuse my bluntness but what the **** are you talking about? Bloodthirsty slaughter has been the story in Syria for the past 2 years and the main culprit has been the better equipped, highly funded and strongly supported Assad regime.

So then there are videos of Assad's forces cutting out a man's lungs and eating them? Because that's what the Al-Qaeda backed rebels are doing. I don't recall any stories of Assad's forces sacking Christian villages and killing people who don't convert. Do tell!
 
So then there are videos of Assad's forces cutting out a man's lungs and eating them? Because that's what the Al-Qaeda backed rebels are doing. I don't recall any stories of Assad's forces sacking Christian villages and killing people who don't convert. Do tell!

no but there are videos of fighter jets dropping napalm like bombs on school playgrounds and the death toll says its own story, a rag tag army of rebels does not inflict that kind of damage its just common sense.
 
no but there are videos of fighter jets dropping napalm like bombs on school playgrounds and the death toll says its own story, a rag tag army of rebels does not inflict that kind of damage its just common sense.
Oh so what you're saying is that Assad's government is using conventional warfare techniques which, SURPRISE, includes using planes to drop weapons on locations where terrorists are hiding. Well let me know when Assad's forces start sacking villages and forcing people to convert their religion or die. In the mean time I support people and governments who fight against the terrorists. Why are you making excuses for terrorists btw?
 
Oh so what you're saying is that Assad's government is using conventional warfare techniques which, SURPRISE, includes using planes to drop weapons on locations where terrorists are hiding. Well let me know when Assad's forces start sacking villages and forcing people to convert their religion or die. In the mean time I support people and governments who fight against the terrorists. Why are you making excuses for terrorists btw?

conventional?

BBC News - Syria crisis: Incendiary bomb victims 'like the walking dead'

No these are not weapons conventional countries use especially in highly populated areas and in the mean time you support dictatorships not governments because this regime has not looked to hand over power for about 30 years.
 
conventional?

BBC News - Syria crisis: Incendiary bomb victims 'like the walking dead'

No these are not weapons conventional countries use especially in highly populated areas and in the mean time you support dictatorships not governments because this regime has not looked to hand over power for about 30 years.
You clearly didn't pay attention to the video in your own link...

"The weapon used was not a chemical one, but a conventional weapon".

English must not be your strong suit, or maybe you're deaf?

I don't know what kind of malarkey you're referring to when you say "conventional country". The phrase reeks of western elitism. How do you define a conventional country I wonder?
 
Both sides are bad but one is much much worse. Did you here about the battle this weekend in which president Assad's forces fought against the Islamic extremists to protect a Christian village but were overwhelmed and had to withdraw allowing the city to fall to the extremists that have killed many and the fate of many is not yet known?

Syria is a messed up place and both sides are the enemy. I know you really don't have much stomach for killing and that's fine. Maybe our world needs more folks like you, Monte. Me - I have no problem killing what I don't much like. I guess a lot of folks think like me, and that's why our species will never stop killing each other.
 
You clearly didn't pay attention to the video in your own link...

"The weapon used was not a chemical one, but a conventional weapon".

English must not be your strong suit, or maybe you're deaf?

I don't know what kind of malarkey you're referring to when you say "conventional country". The phrase reeks of western elitism. How do you define a conventional country I wonder?

No same link it mentions the fact its not a weapon the West uses or condones. You use phrases like western elitism but the fact is the west runs the show and we stop this world descending into chaos. But by all means continue to support this dictatorship, I mean dictatorships have such a good history.
 
It's pretty simple, if the United States strikes Syria - Every Christian in the Middle East and parts of Africa will be executed.... The Muslims are on a free-for-all right now attacking all non-Muslims... Not only that but he want's to bomb on their behalf......

Not only that but Iran and Russia will certainly strike which could without question result in WWIII....

Obama wants to strike Syria to empower Muslims - nothing more and nothing less...

Why isn't Obamy saying a ****ing thing about Egypt and the Christian genocide?

This is so far beyond Republican/Democrat - Obama is a ****ing idiot...

This is what you get when you elect someone based on affirmative action alone.... This **** is all ****ed up...

This **** has turned into an "all in" poker game...
 
Sorry to say that the only way for this to end is to let Syria fight their own civil war...

Muslims are the nutball radicals that are killing Christians and Christians want to go down as Martyrs on basic principal...

Of course Obama doesn't care.......

He will say something about Travon Martin but not a genocide???
 
No same link it mentions the fact its not a weapon the West uses or condones. You use phrases like western elitism but the fact is the west runs the show and we stop this world descending into chaos. But by all means continue to support this dictatorship, I mean dictatorships have such a good history.
"..but 15 year old Ahmed's government didn't sign that treaty".
Who gives a **** about what the West condones? Syria didn't sign the treaty. I don't know if you're hearing impaired or are just having difficulty processing information. Either way it's cleear that you didn't watch your own video.

Are you going to force Western laws and ideals on Syria? Who's responsibility is it to do that? So likewise you wouldn't have a problem with the Mid-east enforcing their ways on the West right? You wouldn't have a problem if Iran or Pakistan started forcing people in France or Sweden to start wearing burqas and operating as theocracies right? After all what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

And if a dictatorship keeps a nation stable and prevents minorities from getting slaughtered by terrorists who want sharia law then that's not entirely a bad thing. It's none of our business being there, but if we have to intervene it should be on the side of the legitimate government and not on the side of Islamic terrorists.
 
it's early here so excuse my bluntness but what the **** are you talking about? Bloodthirsty slaughter has been the story in Syria for the past 2 years and the main culprit has been the better equipped, highly funded and strongly supported Assad regime.

Uh no, you only look right and never left!
 
Oh so what you're saying is that Assad's government is using conventional warfare techniques which, SURPRISE, includes using planes to drop weapons on locations where terrorists are hiding. Well let me know when Assad's forces start sacking villages and forcing people to convert their religion or die. In the mean time I support people and governments who fight against the terrorists. Why are you making excuses for terrorists btw?


You'll get nowhere with her, she supports the terrorists and wants president Assad gone and them running things!
 
Syria is a messed up place and both sides are the enemy. I know you really don't have much stomach for killing and that's fine. Maybe our world needs more folks like you, Monte. Me - I have no problem killing what I don't much like. I guess a lot of folks think like me, and that's why our species will never stop killing each other.


Yeah Snap, I know you're not alone in how you feel. Btw, you didn't respond to my quote you put up.
 
Back
Top Bottom