SO again thats not negative thats positive
2.) sounds right depending on the homosexual "curriculum" and class, no consequences.
if it was a single class called homosexuality and it was mandatory id agree with you by something tells me it wasnt
3.) again another positive judges enforcing the laws on the books and protecting peoples rights
4.) what every your OPINION of traditional family is isnt not effect in reality
5.) religious freedom is still intact
nothing you brought up is a negative consequence of equal rights for gays in fact they arent even anything new lol
people said the same thing when women and minorities were granted rights
the law is doing the same it always has, protecting rights.
so again i sake and try to focus on the words
do anybody have any FACTUAL NEGATIVE consequences
you not liking wanting them to have rights and be equal to the rest of us is not a consequence
all his concerned are pest on his hurt feelings and not on realty facts and peoples rights
people think they should have to serve whites, blacks, asians, lations, women, men, chrisitians, jews etc and dont want their kids learning in school that those people exists and are just people either but guess what, to freaking bad
get home schooled then or simply tell you kid what you want them to learn while they are hime
When the election is over and we open our eyes, it will sadly be too late to wonder what the hell just happened.
Since the definition of marriage is being changed, I'm going to place my bet on incest to be the next frontier.... after all the gay activists claim “Life comes down to who you love and who loves you back — government has no place in the middle.”
Shouldn’t that include committed incestuous relationships? If love and commitment are now the justification for marriage, why exempt this? The reason we don't allow incest relationships is because of the deformity in the children it can cause. But wait! Gay couples can't have children! So what's stopping them? A father with a son/step-son or a mother and a daughter/step daughter can't produce children.
I can see a real tax advantage to this also for If that were so, if I wanted to pass on my estate without death [taxes], I could marry my daughter and pass on my estate to her. After all if life comes down to who you love and who loves you back, if a father and son love each other so much they want to get married, there is little moral difference between two people of the same sex getting married who are not related and want to be and two people of the same sex who already are related becoming closer.
Last edited by vesper; 09-09-13 at 05:41 PM.