- Joined
- Jul 28, 2013
- Messages
- 25,834
- Reaction score
- 25,190
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: On gay marriage, America's house may not stay divided for long
That is not what I stated and stop putting words into my post that are not there.
The gay rights movement IS associated with NAMBLA through members of NAMBLA also advocates for gay rights.
The gay rights movement including NAMBLA support same sex marriage
People should be informed of the founding of the gay rights movement and until recently had a new makeover separating themselves from NAMBLA because of its unpopularity.
That would be more accurate.
As far as the rest of your gobbledygook
Most people don't call Hitler a Christian today, but during his reign he certainly had enough Germans convinced he was.
As far as interracial couples, that is still an issue of marriage between a man and a woman and has little to nothing to do with same sex marriage. If some still practice it in the South then let that be a lesson for the learning that you can not legislate every racist practice out of existence and it's time to stop trying.
As far as consequences for redefining marriage...what can currently be observed is....
Redefining marriage marginalizes those with traditional views and leads to the erosion of religious liberty. The laws that are being written to define discrimination while those who support same sex marriages are eradicating such views through economic, social, and legal pressure. The consequences for religious believers are becoming apparent. Recently in the news multiple federal justices have been willing to deny rights of conscience to those who deny services to gay couples in relation to gay marriage. They are forced to carry a burden of legal expenses that no person should have to encounter in this country in exercising their constitutional rights of conscience. But that is how the game is played on the left. They use Lawfare, a type of warfare where politically appointed justices can make asinine judgments to further a political agenda allow a false validation to stand. And those who don't know a Constitutional right from the hole in their arse are the dumb sheeple giving homage to such opinons.
Another current example of consequence is after Massachusetts redefined marriage to include same-sex relationships, Catholic Charities of Boston was forced to discontinue its adoption services rather than place children with same-sex couples against its principles.
Massachusetts public schools began teaching grade-school students about same-sex marriage, defending their decision because they are “committed to teaching about the world they live in, and in Massachusetts same-sex marriage is legal.” But it didn't stop there, Massachusetts appellate court ruled that parents have no right to exempt their children from these classes.
The denial of parental rights in public schools and the denial of Religious freedoms are two pretty big ones in my book.
1. A founder of the gay rights movement was associated with NAMBLA.
2. The gay rights movement supports same sex marriage.
3. People don't like NAMBLA.
4. Therefore, people should not support the gay rights movement or same sex marriage.
That is still an association fallacy. Do you actually not see how it is illogical? That is like me saying, "Hitler called himself a Christian, and I think if most believers realized that Hitler was a Christian, nobody would want to be a Christian." That is pretty weak.
There are still churches in the South that will not marry interracial couples. Conflict between religious views and social progress is always going to occur.
That is not what I stated and stop putting words into my post that are not there.
The gay rights movement IS associated with NAMBLA through members of NAMBLA also advocates for gay rights.
The gay rights movement including NAMBLA support same sex marriage
People should be informed of the founding of the gay rights movement and until recently had a new makeover separating themselves from NAMBLA because of its unpopularity.
That would be more accurate.
As far as the rest of your gobbledygook
Most people don't call Hitler a Christian today, but during his reign he certainly had enough Germans convinced he was.
As far as interracial couples, that is still an issue of marriage between a man and a woman and has little to nothing to do with same sex marriage. If some still practice it in the South then let that be a lesson for the learning that you can not legislate every racist practice out of existence and it's time to stop trying.
As far as consequences for redefining marriage...what can currently be observed is....
Redefining marriage marginalizes those with traditional views and leads to the erosion of religious liberty. The laws that are being written to define discrimination while those who support same sex marriages are eradicating such views through economic, social, and legal pressure. The consequences for religious believers are becoming apparent. Recently in the news multiple federal justices have been willing to deny rights of conscience to those who deny services to gay couples in relation to gay marriage. They are forced to carry a burden of legal expenses that no person should have to encounter in this country in exercising their constitutional rights of conscience. But that is how the game is played on the left. They use Lawfare, a type of warfare where politically appointed justices can make asinine judgments to further a political agenda allow a false validation to stand. And those who don't know a Constitutional right from the hole in their arse are the dumb sheeple giving homage to such opinons.
Another current example of consequence is after Massachusetts redefined marriage to include same-sex relationships, Catholic Charities of Boston was forced to discontinue its adoption services rather than place children with same-sex couples against its principles.
Massachusetts public schools began teaching grade-school students about same-sex marriage, defending their decision because they are “committed to teaching about the world they live in, and in Massachusetts same-sex marriage is legal.” But it didn't stop there, Massachusetts appellate court ruled that parents have no right to exempt their children from these classes.
The denial of parental rights in public schools and the denial of Religious freedoms are two pretty big ones in my book.
Last edited: