Page 4 of 27 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 267

Thread: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure[W:208]

  1. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Theoretical Physics Lab
    Last Seen
    01-06-15 @ 11:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    25,120

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    They can voice their opinions publicly, freedom of speech and the public can decide.
    I consider it criminal to deny people their right to "vote" through their money. Do you support boycotts? From your viewpoint, you clearly don't.

  2. #32
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post


    if i have such an uncivil discourse for whites, blacks, asians, latinos, women, men, gays, bi-sexuals, chrsitians, jews, muslims, and or the handicap why do i open a public access business? if i do im an idiot and that my fault if i break the law.
    What about one eyed purple people eaters?

  3. #33
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by Gipper View Post
    I consider it criminal to deny people their right to "vote" through their money. Do you support boycotts? From your viewpoint, you clearly don't.
    I have no problem with individuals boycotting.

  4. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Theoretical Physics Lab
    Last Seen
    01-06-15 @ 11:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    25,120

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    I have no problem with individuals boycotting.
    So you support people boycotting through principle, but you also support compulsory service-providing against principle.

    You have a third side of your mouth you want to talk out of as well?

  5. #35
    Advisor douglas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Seen
    06-29-16 @ 03:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    458

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    ~snip~
    Obama and the Democrats are already running a full scale eugenics program. It's called Planned Parenthood and Hip Hop Culture.
    Neither Obama nor Democrats are in any way, shape, or form responsible for either of those groups. You're seriously paranoid, sir.
    Homosexuality was never removed from the DSM Criteria for scientific reasons. Purely political ones. Money buys morality in US Politics.
    When you make accusations like that, you should really back it up. In either case, DSM has never had anything to do with morality, so I don't know what your point is.
    Not accepting homosexuality as normal doesn't mean I hate gay people. This is why people like you are really the bigots. You paint people as villains when they don't go along with the politically correct narrative. It's not against the law yet to have an opinion in this country. It's still my right to determine my own morality. This the real problem with homosexuality being normalized and gay marriage. The State is now becoming a religion. You must accept sodomy as normal and support homosexual marriage or you will be a moral outcast.
    Accepting people isn't a PC stunt. It's basic human compassion. But, there is no law saying you have to accept anyone or anything. Anti-gay supporters are being vilified by social forces, not legal ones; Society is throwing you out as a moral outcast, not the law.

    Tell that to the photographers being targeted for not wanting to take pictures of gay weddings
    Again, there is no law saying you have to accept anything as a private citizen. Even in business, they specifically said that you could print any message you wanted on products, no matter how offensive they are to the gay community, and communicate your dislike for them at every turn. I assure you, if you put up a giant "I hate gays" sign on your business, you're going to have no problems. You'll have no business either, but that's the cost of being a schmuck.

  6. #36
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,833

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    What about one eyed purple people eaters?
    awww shucks i left them out, yes they need love too!
    Flying_Purple_People_Eater_by_Sklavenbrause.jpg
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  7. #37
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,833

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    I have no problem with individuals boycotting.
    boycotts are what helped put the bakery in the OP out of business i totally support that
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  8. #38
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by Gipper View Post
    So you support people boycotting through principle, but you also support compulsory service-providing against principle.

    You have a third side of your mouth you want to talk out of as well?
    A business of public accommodation is different than an individual.

  9. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    You said it served no social or economic purpose. It serves the same social and economic purpose as hetero marriage does. It's all about property rights. Whether or not it serves a biological purpose isn't the states business.
    It doesn't

    Homosexual Sex doesn't create new taxpayers

    Biology isn't in the state's interest? Yet all of our personal information is fair game right?

    Based on what? Honestly, where is your evidence of this? You realize that what I posed is about well researched findings, right? On what do you argue that?
    There is no gay gene. Studies of identical twins have proven this. There are multiple threads about it here where I freely gave my opinion on the subject. You can start there.

    No, of course not. Maybe I misunderstood, but that seemed to be your argument. Are you saying instead that they aren't born gay? If so, how do they become gay?
    You're the one who made the comparison

    I'm trying to understand to what extent you want the government to go in governing based on perceived biological imperative.
    I don't want Government involved in marriage. If it isn't going to support the science and purpose behind a man and woman's union, on this planet and instead make it about people's feelings and taxes, then Government should just get out.

    Based on what? Why do you say this? Where do you get this information?
    Go back and read about the 1974 vote when it was removed. There was no scientific breakthrough that suddenly homosexuality was normal. The campaign, like every other leftist campaign, started with gays protesting in San Francisco. It was political pressure that led to the removal of homosexuality from the DSM criteria.

    I just finished saying you don't have to accept anything as normal and you don't have to support anything and you're free to have your bitter, angry and judgemental opinions about other people. No one cares, at all. Not a single person. But you don't have the right to circumvent the Constitution to create discriminatory law.
    Who are you to judge whether my opinions are "bitter, angry and judgmental"?

    That's not an "atheist government". I'd love to hear how you think that's an "atheist government".
    What God does Obama believe in? Don't tell me what he pretends to in front of the cameras. Democrats removed God from their platform. What God(s) does Obama worship and what is the moral foundation of his beliefs?

    You keep making assertions, that you seem to be very sure of, with no backing, at all. There is no gay gene, homosexuality was removed from the DSM for political reasons, People aren't born gay. But what research are you basing this on? Or is it just how you feel about it, and you haven't bothered to question it? How do you know there are no genes that influence homosexuality? how do you know that the DSM was changed for political reasons and that someone "bought" it? How do you know they aren't born gay? What evidence do you have?
    We've been over this many times. Feel free to provide the story that a gay gene was found if you don't believe me.

  10. #40
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Theoretical Physics Lab
    Last Seen
    01-06-15 @ 11:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    25,120

    Re: San Antonio Adopts Disputed Gay Rights Measure

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    A business of public accommodation is different than an individual.
    And when it's the public sector, I agree.

    When it's the private sector, I see it as a gross abuse of power. It's just the state enforcing its will. It's no different than all the bullcrap cases of "Eminent Domain" where the little guy gets stepped on because we keep giving over our rights and free will.

    We let ourselves become a government big enough to give us all we want. Unfortunately, not enough of us suffer the outrage when it's big enough to take it all away.

Page 4 of 27 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •