When you make accusations like that, you should really back it up. In either case, DSM has never had anything to do with morality, so I don't know what your point is.Homosexuality was never removed from the DSM Criteria for scientific reasons. Purely political ones. Money buys morality in US Politics.
Accepting people isn't a PC stunt. It's basic human compassion. But, there is no law saying you have to accept anyone or anything. Anti-gay supporters are being vilified by social forces, not legal ones; Society is throwing you out as a moral outcast, not the law.Not accepting homosexuality as normal doesn't mean I hate gay people. This is why people like you are really the bigots. You paint people as villains when they don't go along with the politically correct narrative. It's not against the law yet to have an opinion in this country. It's still my right to determine my own morality. This the real problem with homosexuality being normalized and gay marriage. The State is now becoming a religion. You must accept sodomy as normal and support homosexual marriage or you will be a moral outcast.
Again, there is no law saying you have to accept anything as a private citizen. Even in business, they specifically said that you could print any message you wanted on products, no matter how offensive they are to the gay community, and communicate your dislike for them at every turn. I assure you, if you put up a giant "I hate gays" sign on your business, you're going to have no problems. You'll have no business either, but that's the cost of being a schmuck.Tell that to the photographers being targeted for not wanting to take pictures of gay weddings
Homosexual Sex doesn't create new taxpayers
Biology isn't in the state's interest? Yet all of our personal information is fair game right?
There is no gay gene. Studies of identical twins have proven this. There are multiple threads about it here where I freely gave my opinion on the subject. You can start there.Based on what? Honestly, where is your evidence of this? You realize that what I posed is about well researched findings, right? On what do you argue that?
You're the one who made the comparisonNo, of course not. Maybe I misunderstood, but that seemed to be your argument. Are you saying instead that they aren't born gay? If so, how do they become gay?
I don't want Government involved in marriage. If it isn't going to support the science and purpose behind a man and woman's union, on this planet and instead make it about people's feelings and taxes, then Government should just get out.I'm trying to understand to what extent you want the government to go in governing based on perceived biological imperative.
Go back and read about the 1974 vote when it was removed. There was no scientific breakthrough that suddenly homosexuality was normal. The campaign, like every other leftist campaign, started with gays protesting in San Francisco. It was political pressure that led to the removal of homosexuality from the DSM criteria.Based on what? Why do you say this? Where do you get this information?
Who are you to judge whether my opinions are "bitter, angry and judgmental"?I just finished saying you don't have to accept anything as normal and you don't have to support anything and you're free to have your bitter, angry and judgemental opinions about other people. No one cares, at all. Not a single person. But you don't have the right to circumvent the Constitution to create discriminatory law.
What God does Obama believe in? Don't tell me what he pretends to in front of the cameras. Democrats removed God from their platform. What God(s) does Obama worship and what is the moral foundation of his beliefs?That's not an "atheist government". I'd love to hear how you think that's an "atheist government".
We've been over this many times. Feel free to provide the story that a gay gene was found if you don't believe me.You keep making assertions, that you seem to be very sure of, with no backing, at all. There is no gay gene, homosexuality was removed from the DSM for political reasons, People aren't born gay. But what research are you basing this on? Or is it just how you feel about it, and you haven't bothered to question it? How do you know there are no genes that influence homosexuality? how do you know that the DSM was changed for political reasons and that someone "bought" it? How do you know they aren't born gay? What evidence do you have?
When it's the private sector, I see it as a gross abuse of power. It's just the state enforcing its will. It's no different than all the bullcrap cases of "Eminent Domain" where the little guy gets stepped on because we keep giving over our rights and free will.
We let ourselves become a government big enough to give us all we want. Unfortunately, not enough of us suffer the outrage when it's big enough to take it all away.