I find it more than just a little offensive that you would dismiss their suffering and the resulting call for action as warmongering. Clearly someone needs to be held responsible for this. I'm definitely not saying no military action. I'm just questioning who the action should target.
You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love.For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
Course The French did say they want to punish Assad. Which was even before there was any evidence attained, and that was after the UN stated the first time the Rebels used Chems. So At least we know the French is about War-Mongering.
Doesn't help them with those 5 Resolutions in the UN for Enforceable Action in 5 different Countries that the French has pressed with.....huh?
Obammer should be held to account for the well-being of Syrian citizens?
Seriously people, what are you thinking?
Someone passing gas in that craphole is not on the list of things we should be focused on.
But it is exactly what they'd rather you think about.
What would victory in Syria look like anyways?
I say we just let them all kill each other. Keep a lid in Al Queda...smoke any Syrian aircraft...and just let them duke it out until they are all war weary or dead.
The Crowd is not the sum of its parts.
If by they you mean the Syrians? Don't worry them IDF boys can deal with that.
If by they you mean the Rooskie's? I'd have to ask: what on earth are you talkin' about Willis?
Pooty was just runnin' his mouth, take a moment to analyze the current disposition of Russian military forces in the area
and then get back to me Bucko
Clearly my intended motive for the question missed the top of your head. It's hypothetical and they is the Russians. What would anybody expect the US should/would do if Russia were to attack our ally Israel. And I ask it because we are in fact going to attack their ally Syria.