• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report shows how recession hit families [W:391, 502]

Awwwww, ain't that cute....:kissy:

Aren't liberals cute together, always cheerleading, always supporting each other, and yet never answering direct questions. Seems that they continue to think with their hearts rather than their brains believing it is the Federal Government's role to take on personal responsibility issues. People make choices in life, sometimes the wrong ones but in the liberal world there are no consequences for poor choices as they seem to expect the taxpayers to bailout those people. Sorry, but that isn't reality.

This country was built on rugged individualism with neighbor helping neighbor not the Federal Govt. becoming that neighbor. You cannot change people only change the circumstances going forward and throwing money at the problem only rewards bad behavior. People learn by making mistakes and learning from those mistakes. If there are no consequences then they learn very little if anything.
 
Aren't liberals cute together, always cheerleading, always supporting each other, and yet never answering direct questions. Seems that they continue to think with their hearts rather than their brains believing it is the Federal Government's role to take on personal responsibility issues. People make choices in life, sometimes the wrong ones but in the liberal world there are no consequences for poor choices as they seem to expect the taxpayers to bailout those people. Sorry, but that isn't reality.

This country was built on rugged individualism with neighbor helping neighbor not the Federal Govt. becoming that neighbor. You cannot change people only change the circumstances going forward and throwing money at the problem only rewards bad behavior. People learn by making mistakes and learning from those mistakes. If there are no consequences then they learn very little if anything.

Man, ain't that the truth...I recently was fortunate enough to make contact with many of my friends from my younger years in MI. When we were all together, we had very short sighted visions, 'what's up for today?', 'where's the party?', 'what can I do to eat today?'.... I got tired of that and left, they stayed...I was shocked to learn that many of them are really no better off today than they were 30 years ago.
 
Man, ain't that the truth...I recently was fortunate enough to make contact with many of my friends from my younger years in MI. When we were all together, we had very short sighted visions, 'what's up for today?', 'where's the party?', 'what can I do to eat today?'.... I got tired of that and left, they stayed...I was shocked to learn that many of them are really no better off today than they were 30 years ago.

yes, but always remember it is society's fault for the poor lot these people have in life and that requires a taxpayer funded entitlement program to help them see the errors of their ways.
 
You'd think that with all the trillions spent since LBJ began
his great society we'd have wiped out this supposed poverty twice over
rather than having actually subsidized it and provided a greater number
of Democrat party supporters?
 
You'd think that with all the trillions spent since LBJ began
his great society we'd have wiped out this supposed poverty twice over
rather than having actually subsidized it and provided a greater number
of Democrat party supporters?

That was always the only goal...Everything else was phony narrative.
 
You'd think that with all the trillions spent since LBJ began
his great society we'd have wiped out this supposed poverty twice over
rather than having actually subsidized it and provided a greater number
of Democrat party supporters?

Aw, but you have it all wrong, all those liberals meant well but spent the money in the wrong areas therefore this group of liberals need more money to spend it more wisely. This group of liberals will solve the problems that the other group of liberals failed to solve.
 
That was always the only goal...Everything else was phony narrative.

Ahhh, conspiracy theories. Not as good as Bush was behind 9/11, or that we want blacks on drugs, or Obama is a Muslim communist, socialist fascist terrorist born in Kenya, or that reality has a liberal bias, but in keeping with those classics.

:lamo:lamo:lamo
 
hah that's all true! Boosch Cheney n Rumsfeld personally flew those planes into those buildings
The CIA invented crack for the blacks
(and some say HIV for them other folks)
Osama was a Moslem and so is Hussien
and the liberal bias in on the lamestream media everyday which is a form of reality?
 
Ahhh, conspiracy theories. Not as good as Bush was behind 9/11, or that we want blacks on drugs, or Obama is a Muslim communist, socialist fascist terrorist born in Kenya, or that reality has a liberal bias, but in keeping with those classics.

:lamo:lamo:lamo

You're letting your 'tell' show Joe.
 
Fascinating. So now your are arguing that people don't own their land. Well, in that case, I guess anyone can just move onto your land and start using it.

Please do not be silly. Where did I argue that? I simply asked you how you know you own the land you claim you own.
 
Please do not be silly. Where did I argue that? I simply asked you how you know you own the land you claim you own.

Because the government is offering to buy it from me and not some other person.
 
Seems your desired strategy is to be a cheerleader and never answer a direct question either. I provide data from BLS.gov, BEA.gov, and the U.S. Treasury Dept. which you never refute and others claim I am interpreting inaccurately therefore one more time, what source or sources do you believe and find to be accurate if not the non partisan sources I post?

Okay - so you say you presented this raft of evidence ..... supporting what point exactly? That was missing from your post.
 
Because the government is offering to buy it from me and not some other person.

So to summarize your two answers: you know it is land you own because

1 - you have a legal title to the land saying you are the owner
2- the government is attempting to buy it from you

Is that correct?

Since you failed to provide any quote from me saying I am against land ownership, it looks like you flushed that fallacy. Progress.
 
So to summarize your two answers: you know it is land you own because

1 - you have a legal title to the land saying you are the owner
2- the government is attempting to buy it from you

Is that correct?

Since you failed to provide any quote from me saying I am against land ownership, it looks like you flushed that fallacy. Progress.

I own it because I bought it form the previous owner.
 
I own it because I bought it form the previous owner.

again--- hwo do you know they owned it and you were not scammed? You previously mentioned a title and now you mention recognition of your ownership by the government.
 
again--- hwo do you know they owned it and you were not scammed? You previously mentioned a title and now you mention recognition of your ownership by the government.

I'm not sure. I suppose it is possible I was scammed.
 
I'm not sure. I suppose it is possible I was scammed.

here is what you said in 466 when I asked you how you knew you owned the land you claim you own

Because the previous owner transferred title to me.

you gave a second reason recently

Because the government is offering to buy it from me and not some other person.
 
Federalist
iz02gy.jpg
 
here is what you said in 466 when I asked you how you knew you owned the land you claim you own

you gave a second reason recently

I own it because I bought it. I don't really know how more clear I can be.
 
I own it because I bought it. I don't really know how more clear I can be.




here is what you said in 466 when I asked you how you knew you owned the land you claim you own


Because the previous owner transferred title to me.

you gave a second reason recently


Because the government is offering to buy it from me and not some other person.
 
here is what you said in 466 when I asked you how you knew you owned the land you claim you own




you gave a second reason recently

So are you asking me a question?
 
So are you asking me a question?

Already did. And you gve me two answers - both of which involved the reliance of YOU upon the GOVERNMENT to recognize that you owned the land you claimed.
 
Already did. And you gve me two answers - both of which involved the reliance of YOU upon the GOVERNMENT to recognize that you owned the land you claimed.

The government coming to buy something from me is evidence that they also think I own the land. The government is not required for ownership to be transferred.

And is this all some sort of argument for why you support the the government initiating aggression against people?
 
Back
Top Bottom