- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Thank you randel - it is appreciated.
Awwwww, ain't that cute....:kissy:
Thank you randel - it is appreciated.
Awwwww, ain't that cute....:kissy:
Aren't liberals cute together, always cheerleading, always supporting each other, and yet never answering direct questions. Seems that they continue to think with their hearts rather than their brains believing it is the Federal Government's role to take on personal responsibility issues. People make choices in life, sometimes the wrong ones but in the liberal world there are no consequences for poor choices as they seem to expect the taxpayers to bailout those people. Sorry, but that isn't reality.
This country was built on rugged individualism with neighbor helping neighbor not the Federal Govt. becoming that neighbor. You cannot change people only change the circumstances going forward and throwing money at the problem only rewards bad behavior. People learn by making mistakes and learning from those mistakes. If there are no consequences then they learn very little if anything.
Man, ain't that the truth...I recently was fortunate enough to make contact with many of my friends from my younger years in MI. When we were all together, we had very short sighted visions, 'what's up for today?', 'where's the party?', 'what can I do to eat today?'.... I got tired of that and left, they stayed...I was shocked to learn that many of them are really no better off today than they were 30 years ago.
You'd think that with all the trillions spent since LBJ began
his great society we'd have wiped out this supposed poverty twice over
rather than having actually subsidized it and provided a greater number
of Democrat party supporters?
You'd think that with all the trillions spent since LBJ began
his great society we'd have wiped out this supposed poverty twice over
rather than having actually subsidized it and provided a greater number
of Democrat party supporters?
That was always the only goal...Everything else was phony narrative.
Ahhh, conspiracy theories. Not as good as Bush was behind 9/11, or that we want blacks on drugs, or Obama is a Muslim communist, socialist fascist terrorist born in Kenya, or that reality has a liberal bias, but in keeping with those classics.
:lamo:lamo:lamo
Fascinating. So now your are arguing that people don't own their land. Well, in that case, I guess anyone can just move onto your land and start using it.
Please do not be silly. Where did I argue that? I simply asked you how you know you own the land you claim you own.
Seems your desired strategy is to be a cheerleader and never answer a direct question either. I provide data from BLS.gov, BEA.gov, and the U.S. Treasury Dept. which you never refute and others claim I am interpreting inaccurately therefore one more time, what source or sources do you believe and find to be accurate if not the non partisan sources I post?
Because the government is offering to buy it from me and not some other person.
So to summarize your two answers: you know it is land you own because
1 - you have a legal title to the land saying you are the owner
2- the government is attempting to buy it from you
Is that correct?
Since you failed to provide any quote from me saying I am against land ownership, it looks like you flushed that fallacy. Progress.
I own it because I bought it form the previous owner.
again--- hwo do you know they owned it and you were not scammed? You previously mentioned a title and now you mention recognition of your ownership by the government.
I'm not sure. I suppose it is possible I was scammed.
Because the previous owner transferred title to me.
Because the government is offering to buy it from me and not some other person.
I'm not sure. I suppose it is possible I was scammed.
here is what you said in 466 when I asked you how you knew you owned the land you claim you own
you gave a second reason recently
I own it because I bought it. I don't really know how more clear I can be.
Because the previous owner transferred title to me.
Because the government is offering to buy it from me and not some other person.
here is what you said in 466 when I asked you how you knew you owned the land you claim you own
you gave a second reason recently
So are you asking me a question?
Already did. And you gve me two answers - both of which involved the reliance of YOU upon the GOVERNMENT to recognize that you owned the land you claimed.