If the tables of this incident were turned, and it was an 88year old black WWII vet that had been attacked in that parking lot by two white teens, the calls of a racist attack would be deafening....And you know it.And what racism? What are you talking about? They criminals who did this have not even been arrested. As of yet, there is no reason to assume that this war hero was killed because of race.
No, outlets like MSNBC, and Al (race extortionist) Sharpton set the narrative that it was, and you bought into it.In the Trayvon case there was a racial element to the case.
GZ was acquitted, and no charges of a racial crime were brought. You are simply wrong on this.Trayvon was not shot because of his race but his shooter did get out of his car because of Travyon's color and appearance.
Then he shouldn't be commenting on ANY of them...Can't pick and choose unless you are doing so for an agenda....If civil rights champions or the president would have to react every time someone is killed by someone of the opposite racial profile they would be doing nothing else. With more than 10,000 homicides a year and subsequent trials they would have a 80 hour work week just with reacting to crimes like this.