• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Diplomats in Benghazi Debacle Back on Job

So tell me, what happened to all the crazy stuff Fox was talking about during the election? all the troops and the armed drone and the AC 130? I think there was a durn good chance the RWers just made this up to help Romney get elected. Now Faux keeps it alive the keep the base emotional and stirred up. The only lying I see is coming from the right/ Oh, I looked up his diary, on Sep 11th the first entry was words to the effect he was glad to be back in Benghazi.

Do you know how to supply links to support these claims you make. You never read a thing.
 
So tell me, what happened to all the crazy stuff Fox was talking about during the election? all the troops and the armed drone and the AC 130? I think there was a durn good chance the RWers just made this up to help Romney get elected. Now Faux keeps it alive the keep the base emotional and stirred up. The only lying I see is coming from the right/ Oh, I looked up his diary, on Sep 11th the first entry was words to the effect he was glad to be back in Benghazi.

I'm not looking at what Fox or the MS media is saying Mak.....I am looking at the Clear and Present danger that was given to our people and their failing to act on it and all those different stories told by Team Obama. That should have been the first clue.....that they couldn't keep their stories straight.

So are you saying Stevens didn't know about the Embassy In Kenya and Tanzania or the 12 Diplomats that were killed there under Democratic rule?
 
So tell me, what happened to all the crazy stuff Fox was talking about during the election? all the troops and the armed drone and the AC 130? I think there was a durn good chance the RWers just made this up to help Romney get elected. Now Faux keeps it alive the keep the base emotional and stirred up. The only lying I see is coming from the right/ Oh, I looked up his diary, on Sep 11th the first entry was words to the effect he was glad to be back in Benghazi.

What do you think his last words were? Something tells me it wasn't "Vote Clinton 2016".
 
Might have been. Obviously you have no concept of dedication to duty and...yea never mind. I really do find it disgusting the right wing attempted to use his death for political gain.
What do you think his last words were? Something tells me it wasn't "Vote Clinton 2016".
 
Might have been. Obviously you have no concept of dedication to duty and...yea never mind. I really do find it disgusting the right wing attempted to use his death for political gain.

Obviously, the people that placed him and the others in that situation have dedication to nothing but themselves.
 
Another accusation completely without evidence.
Obviously, the people that placed him and the others in that situation have dedication to nothing but themselves.
 
In context she was talking about 4 dead Americcans, and the RWnutjob that was asking her questions asked over and over about the video or something else very meaningles at the time. In context she was saying there were 4 dead Amercians, what difference does that stupid question make? This is another perfect example of why the RW has no creditablity. TE=ItAin'tFree;1062252912]"What difference does it make?"-H. Clinton.[/QUOTE]
 
Might have been. Obviously you have no concept of dedication to duty and...yea never mind. I really do find it disgusting the right wing attempted to use his death for political gain.

Mornin' Mak. :2wave: Did you find it disgusting with Obama and the Democrats using children and the Dead to go after gun rights?
 
Mornin' Mak. :2wave: Did you find it disgusting with Obama and the Democrats using children and the Dead to go after gun rights?

Good Morning MMC. Yea, I dont like that either.
 
In context she was talking about 4 dead Americcans, and the RWnutjob that was asking her questions asked over and over about the video or something else very meaningles at the time. In context she was saying there were 4 dead Amercians, what difference does that stupid question make? This is another perfect example of why the RW has no creditablity. TE=ItAin'tFree;1062252912]"What difference does it make?"-H. Clinton.
[/QUOTE]

What Hillary said--and I watched her say it live and understood the context perfectly well--is just one reason why she should never be President, and I said at the time on this board that I hoped there would be an endless loop of "What difference does it make?" commercials for any/all of her opponents. What chutzpah being "exasperated" by the questions.

The difference still matters.
 
It is difficult to find any lawmakers, except those deeply entrenched in Obama's camp, who are in favor of an attack on Syria. It is now too late for Obama to save face over the Benghazi debacle other than hoping the media and public forget about it and that won't happen, so Obama will now try to shore up his "legacy" by striking Syria, since he made the "red line" comment. Since Obama won't be seeking reelection, his "legacy" is his priority now.
 
In context she was talking about 4 dead Americcans, and the RWnutjob that was asking her questions asked over and over about the video or something else very meaningles at the time. In context she was saying there were 4 dead Amercians, what difference does that stupid question make? This is another perfect example of why the RW has no creditablity. TE=ItAin'tFree;1062252912]"What difference does it make?"-H. Clinton.
[/QUOTE]

In context, she didn't want to answer questions about their deaths. Nothing she could say with any truth to it, would have provided the cover she and the Obama administration were seeking.

But feel free to continue with the comedy show.
 
It is difficult to find any lawmakers, except those deeply entrenched in Obama's camp, who are in favor of an attack on Syria. It is now too late for Obama to save face over the Benghazi debacle other than hoping the media and public forget about it and that won't happen, so Obama will now try to shore up his "legacy" by striking Syria, since he made the "red line" comment. Since Obama won't be seeking reelection, his "legacy" is his priority now.

It's likely his 'legacy' has already been established.
 
You guys just keep making stuff up.
It is difficult to find any lawmakers, except those deeply entrenched in Obama's camp, who are in favor of an attack on Syria. It is now too late for Obama to save face over the Benghazi debacle other than hoping the media and public forget about it and that won't happen, so Obama will now try to shore up his "legacy" by striking Syria, since he made the "red line" comment. Since Obama won't be seeking reelection, his "legacy" is his priority now.
 
I watched it live too. I was pretty impressed that Hillary cared enough about 4 American deaths to get PO'd at some idiot for asking her a stupid question repeatedly when the important thing was 4 Americans were dead. The RW has taken her statement out of context and now tries to make it sound like she was saying that about the 4 deaths. She wasnt. This is another RW lie.


What Hillary said--and I watched her say it live and understood the context perfectly well--is just one reason why she should never be President, and I said at the time on this board that I hoped there would be an endless loop of "What difference does it make?" commercials for any/all of her opponents. What chutzpah being "exasperated" by the questions.

The difference still matters.[/QUOTE]
 
I watched it live too. I was pretty impressed that Hillary cared enough about 4 American deaths to get PO'd at some idiot for asking her a stupid question repeatedly when the important thing was 4 Americans were dead. The RW has taken her statement out of context and now tries to make it sound like she was saying that about the 4 deaths. She wasnt. This is another RW lie.

A stupid question? I think the course of the question that Sen. Johnson was asking was spot on....He was backing Hillary into a corner, because we were under attack, and Hillary, nor the administration lifted a finger to get aid to these people. Sen. Johnson was simply trying to ask why not one individual in the State Dept. spoke with any survivor of the attacks at Benghazi before parading out that ridiculous claim that it was due to a video....Hillary got mad, and blurted out the truth, that the people killed didn't matter how it happened.

I think that is clear for anyone with eyes to see....



You say it was taken out of context? I say hell no it wasn't....It was a callous outburst because she was being called on her incompetency, and revealed that she needs be NOWHERE the oval office in a leadership role.
 
dammit, I forgot last night. I really will watch it tonight.

Not to worry....I think we have passed by that, but I did want to highlight how easy it is for someone to try and get back to the point made, but forget, then think later that they prevailed in that point when in reality it was never settled...

Now, it would be very easy for you at this point to just brush it off and say "what difference does it make", but then I would have a legitimate claim that you dodged the point. At this point it is relevant.
 
Hillary's comment was taken out of context. The RWers try to imply she was saying what difference does it make 4 Americans died? That is not what she said. Saying she did is a lie.
 
I will watch it tonight, I have been busier at home than I have been at work lately.
Not to worry....I think we have passed by that, but I did want to highlight how easy it is for someone to try and get back to the point made, but forget, then think later that they prevailed in that point when in reality it was never settled...

Now, it would be very easy for you at this point to just brush it off and say "what difference does it make", but then I would have a legitimate claim that you dodged the point. At this point it is relevant.
 
Her exact words. Implying she was saying something else is a lie. "Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans," Clinton said. "What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?"
 
Back
Top Bottom