Then perhaps you can cite some historical precedence where Presidents allowed their diplomats to die and did not send in reinforcements or help but instead just ignored their requests.
You had bombed them to help the people who are in power and now they wont help you? What kind of screw-up is that? Is is the job of the Obama administration to lead from behind drop bombs on people they don't like, with no regards for the consequences? Isn't that rather short-sighted?That does ignore the reality we had bombed them to help the people who are in power now set up their sovereign government. We did not invade, and yes that means that from a diplomacy standpoint we do have to respect their sovereignity. Plus it would completely undermine any efforts we made and the government that was established if US troops were allowed to march through civilian areas and act as invaders. None of the citizens of that country would have been OK with that.
Isn't that exactly what you did earlier to Libya? And what did it get you??So because a country cannot make a legitimate war with the US we should be allowed to do whatever we want to and violate any sovereign nation's borders? That is a pretty messed up attitude on your part.