- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 7,890
- Reaction score
- 4,730
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Probable cause exists for a very good reason. The state has no business violating peoples privacy unless they have sufficient evidence to suggest criminal activity. Bloombergs stop and frisk debacle demonstrates exactly why such programs are prone to abuse and shouldn't exist. Targeting people in public housing is nothing more than an abuser picking victims with the least ability to fight back.
Fingerprinting is not actually as reliable as popular media makes it out to be, and databases especially are seriously inaccurate. The odds that innocent people will be "matched" and convicted are especially high for people in public housing who can't afford decent lawyers.
Fingerprinting is not actually as reliable as popular media makes it out to be, and databases especially are seriously inaccurate. The odds that innocent people will be "matched" and convicted are especially high for people in public housing who can't afford decent lawyers.