• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama-mask clown gets lifetime Missouri fair ban. Just, or too harsh?[W:395]

Grant said:
It's all about "the persecution complex on the right". What "political commentary" was there? It was, as you say, from an ACTUAL clown!!!! There was no 'political commentary' whatsoever.
Click to expand...

If it wasn't any kind of "political commentary," then why all the interest in a clown being fired? You go on about his rights, and bring up things that those "meanie Libs" said about Bush, then when it's convenient for you it wasn't "political." Bull droppings. Either it was and it's important, or it wasn't and then who cares.

By blaming it all on a persecution complex and calling it 'political commentary', and trying to trivialize the incident, you are indeed defending the indefensible.
Click to expand...

No, that's not defending what they did. Nowhere did I say it was right. You're putting words and meanings in my mouth then getting all worked up in a righteous fury when anyone does the same to you. You don't get to play by your own BS rules of "I can do whatever I want, and everybody else has to play by my rules so I always win." That's like a 4 year old inventing a card game.

You are trivializing it when you want to, and then saying I'm defending something when I trivialize it. Right within the same ****ing paragraph!
 
Grant said:
Do people have to be a certain color before they can comment?
Click to expand...

The poster said he'd never heard a non-black complain about racism. Right in the midst of his complaint about racism.
 
obvious Child said:
Answer me this: if the rodeo clown wasn't alluding to the President, why did this make the news when all the other gags on Obama don't make the news? You won't answer that.
Click to expand...

Well you see, when a Conservative does it, it's protected speech. But don't say it was political, because it was just a clown, but don't trivialize it by saying it was just a clown because if you do that you're defending the fascists.

Their own rules....these guys should stick to the Fox Nation echo chamber.
 
obvious Child said:
Using gags is. Openly calling for the audience to see their opinions on running down a symbol of the President is not.
Click to expand...

Unless you think there is a chance in hell that the President would ever be in a position to be actually "run down" by an actual live Bull, then all it is, is a gag...Much like SNL, or other entertainers in our daily life that we think shouldn't be delving into political arenas with their opinions....Take Eddy Vedder of Pearl Jam in NJ 2003.



Pick up the video at around the 5:30 minute mark. See Vedder thinks he's being enlightening, and all the while the crowd is booing them. He's one of those jack asses that thinks his opinion is more relevant than anyone elses. Who care's about what Eddy Vedder thinks about anything? Shut up and sing! Am I right?

Try again. ItAin'tFree just idiotically grasped on to that without reading it for comprehension. It's embarrassing watching your side grasp for anything to meet my very simple request.
Click to expand...

No, IAF is only saying what the rest of us are, and that is that to get all upset over some obscure rodeo in MO. that you wouldn't have even heard about had the media didn't guffaw at, jaws agape because someone mocked their hero, their savior, their invested face of a failed movement, then it would have gone un noticed, sans the crowd there for the rodeo, along with the one or two liberals in the crowd that made the initial stink, because they can't take a little mockery.

Now, if you want to continue to post in feigned outrage, throwing around highly insulting, and inflammatory language, in near temper tantrum mode, all over a rodeo clown in one rodeo in MO. then by all means go right ahead, but just know that this was a fake outrage drummed up by your own side to divert attention from the failures you now refuse to face on a daily basis.
 
rocket88 said:
If it wasn't any kind of "political commentary," then why all the interest in a clown being fired?
Click to expand...

What 'political commentary' do you think there was, given that it was you who made the claim.
You go on about his rights, and bring up things that those "meanie Libs" said about Bush, then when it's convenient for you it wasn't "political." Bull droppings. Either it was and it's important, or it wasn't and then who cares.
Click to expand...

I did not use the term "meanie Libs". Please learn to use the quote system properly.

No, that's not defending what they did. Nowhere did I say it was right. You're putting words and meanings in my mouth then getting all worked up in a righteous fury when anyone does the same to you. You don't get to play by your own BS rules of "I can do whatever I want, and everybody else has to play by my rules so I always win." That's like a 4 year old inventing a card game.
Click to expand...

I have quoted you directly.

You are trivializing it when you want to, and then saying I'm defending something when I trivialize it. Right within the same ****ing paragraph!
Click to expand...

Calm down and read what you sat before posting it.
Click to expand...
 
This is much ado about nothing. I remember when Bush was president and there was a specific instance where someone created a mannequin to look like GWB and had it hanging by the neck from a tree limb.
 
rocket88 said:
Well you see, when a Conservative does it, it's protected speech. But don't say it was political, because it was just a clown, but don't trivialize it by saying it was just a clown because if you do that you're defending the fascists.

Their own rules....these guys should stick to the Fox Nation echo chamber.
Click to expand...

That's such bull crap.
 
ChrisL said:
That's such bull crap.
Click to expand...

That's what we're hearing from them. When they want it to be political, it is. Then when it's "just a clown," it is. Flip flopping within the same paragraph.
 
j-mac said:
Now, if you want to continue to post in feigned outrage, throwing around highly insulting, and inflammatory language, in near temper tantrum mode, all over a rodeo clown in one rodeo in MO. then by all means go right ahead, but just know that this was a fake outrage drummed up by your own side to divert attention from the failures you now refuse to face on a daily basis.
Click to expand...

The fake outrage was drummed up on your side. Just so you know.
 
rocket88 said:
That's what we're hearing from them. When they want it to be political, it is. Then when it's "just a clown," it is. Flip flopping within the same paragraph.
Click to expand...

Again, that is just a load of bull. It works the same no matter which side is doing it. It's all the same, just from differing ideologies. Just like I said about the GWB incident, which liberals defended at that time as free speech.
 
ChrisL said:
This is much ado about nothing. I remember when Bush was president and there was a specific instance where someone created a mannequin to look like GWB and had it hanging by the neck from a tree limb.
Click to expand...

Right, and no one got fired or banned for it. It was just a stupid thing to do and recognized by most as just that.
 
ChrisL said:
Again, that is just a load of bull. It works the same no matter which side is doing it. It's all the same, just from differing ideologies. Just like I said about the GWB incident, which liberals defended at that time as free speech.
Click to expand...

It was free speech just as this is. That's not what I'm saying.

What I'm saying is that in one breath they trivialize it, then in the next sentence they say that trivializing it is wrong. In one post, this is the biggest deal ever, and in the next post it's Liberals drumming up faux outrage.
 
rocket88 said:
The fake outrage was drummed up on your side. Just so you know.
Click to expand...

An entertainer is fired for making a joke, banned for life, charged with racism, and the outrage is coming from which side???
 
Grant said:
An entertainer is fired for making a joke, banned for life, charged with racism, and the outrage is coming from which side???
Click to expand...

Wow, you didn't even put you flip flopping in different sentences there. Good job. :roll:
 
rocket88 said:
It was free speech just as this is. That's not what I'm saying.

What I'm saying is that in one breath they trivialize it, then in the next sentence they say that trivializing it is wrong. In one post, this is the biggest deal ever, and in the next post it's Liberals drumming up faux outrage.
Click to expand...

I would refer you to post #365. :)
 
rocket88 said:
Wow, you didn't even put you flip flopping in different sentences there. Good job. :roll:
Click to expand...

Yet you still can't find an area in which you can debate without using false 'quotes'. Any 'flip flopping' should be easy to point out but you can't even do that.
 
rocket88 said:
Wow, you didn't even put you flip flopping in different sentences there. Good job. :roll:
Click to expand...

I must have missed the flip-flopping. It seemed like a congruent and coherent post to me.
 
rocket88 said:
The fake outrage was drummed up on your side. Just so you know.
Click to expand...

No, wrong again rocket....The "flap" was initiated the moment that the NAACP called for Secret Service investigations of a rodeo clown, and then wanted him prosecuted for threatening the POTUS...Laughable really...Our side wasn't expressing 'outrage' as much as we were laughing at people like you defending the initial over the top call for over reaction on your sides part....
 
j-mac said:
No, wrong again rocket....The "flap" was initiated the moment that the NAACP called for Secret Service investigations of a rodeo clown, and then wanted him prosecuted for threatening the POTUS...Laughable really...Our side wasn't expressing 'outrage' as much as we were laughing at people like you defending the initial over the top call for over reaction on your sides part....
Click to expand...

It really is silly, and then you have the people who claim it's encouraging people to want to "murder" the president. :roll:
 
ChrisL said:
It really is silly, and then you have the people who claim it's encouraging people to want to "murder" the president. :roll:
Click to expand...


And the murder rates in Chicago, and Detroit keep rising.
 
j-mac said:
No, wrong again rocket....The "flap" was initiated the moment that the NAACP called for Secret Service investigations of a rodeo clown, and then wanted him prosecuted for threatening the POTUS...Laughable really...Our side wasn't expressing 'outrage' as much as we were laughing at people like you defending the initial over the top call for over reaction on your sides part....
Click to expand...

These charges from The Party Of Perpetual Outrage seem incoherent and oddly illogical, but that about sums up leftist thinking anyway.
 
ChrisL said:
It really is silly, and then you have the people who claim it's encouraging people to want to "murder" the president. :roll:
Click to expand...

It really is Chris, and it's why so many people get discouraged from political involvement today. It seems there are many better things in life than this but at the same time responsible people often have a duty to respond to this stuff.
 
obvious Child said:
Actually that was you. I never made any claim about bulls other than that they can injure and hurt people. Go find the quote where I said anything about bulls other than that.

Try. You will fail.



Answer me this: if the rodeo clown wasn't alluding to the President, why did this make the news when all the other gags on Obama don't make the news? You won't answer that.



That's ironic given what you failed to realize and what you will run away from answering.
Click to expand...


LOL. Typical liberal. Lie, twist, squirm. wiggle, whatever. It never changes .

Post #319 of this thread. You, not me or anyone else, just you. "It is irrelevant what a bull thinks". You just failed. Again.


LOL. Show me the news articles of the gags on Obama that don't make the news. LOL. Are you really that dum... never mind. There, I just answered that. Easy to see you never graduated with honors in anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom