Page 13 of 14 FirstFirst ... 311121314 LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 133

Thread: White House-No more Spending Cuts

  1. #121
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:25 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,264

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by lolabird View Post
    I can't show you a surplus that is long gone. Wish I could though.
    The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 was signed into law by Bush on February 13, 2008. Are you seriously trying to persuade this audience that
    Bush convinced Senator Obama to sign it?
    Again, surpluses are yearly, debt is cumulative so yes, you can show me a surplus if one existed and it would be at that Treasury site I gave you. The taxpayers of this country fund debt service off that site so a surplus would have meant a reduction in debt service which didn't happen.

    As for the stimulus I was talking about the ARRA that Obama signed in February 2009 that was supposed to prevent unemployment from exceeding 8% and take unemployment to 5.6% today.

    Kid, you are out of your league here. Do better research or stop posting as it makes you look foolish.

  2. #122
    Sage
    Fenton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    26,264

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by lolabird View Post
    Your lesson for today: Facts do not equal Hatred

    Please enlighten the people opining on this thread of the American economy when George Bush left office.
    Did Bush sign an economic stimulus package? If so, why?
    The economy was suffering as a consequence of the Democrat mandated Sub-Prime Bubble.

    Talk about facts.....you should post a few.

  3. #123
    Educator
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Last Seen
    01-03-14 @ 10:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    642

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Again, surpluses are yearly, debt is cumulative so yes, you can show me a surplus if one existed and it would be at that Treasury site I gave you. The taxpayers of this country fund debt service off that site so a surplus would have meant a reduction in debt service which didn't happen.

    As for the stimulus I was talking about the ARRA that Obama signed in February 2009 that was supposed to prevent unemployment from exceeding 8% and take unemployment to 5.6% today.

    Kid, you are out of your league here. Do better research or stop posting as it makes you look foolish.
    Are you claiming to be in the big dogs league? Ruff Ruff!
    Tying to pull a Rick Perry won't work on this woman. Got anything else?

  4. #124
    Educator
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Last Seen
    01-03-14 @ 10:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    642

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenton View Post
    The economy was suffering as a consequence of the Democrat mandated Sub-Prime Bubble.

    Talk about facts.....you should post a few.
    Community Reinvestment Act was signed by Bush's father. Both President's knew about sub-prime. Any idea why there were no regulations on Wall Street?

  5. #125
    Sage

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Seen
    10-10-16 @ 10:59 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    6,073

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenton View Post
    What corporate "subsidies " ?

    Point to the specific outlays in the budget that prove Corporations are recieving subsidies
    Asking for proof that GOP pols doll out corporate welfare is like asking for proof that water is wet

  6. #126
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:25 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,264

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by lolabird View Post
    Are you claiming to be in the big dogs league? Ruff Ruff!
    Tying to pull a Rick Perry won't work on this woman. Got anything else?
    Just the facts, Ma'am and you have none at all. The CRA was signed by Carter. Maybe you ought to go back to watching the soaps.

    Community Reinvestment Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    There was no Clinton surplus but what is a shame is that people like you only show your jealousy at how TX is being run wishing you were here. It is open season on liberals and none are allowed on the streets after dark except in Austin.

  7. #127
    Educator
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Last Seen
    01-03-14 @ 10:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    642

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    Just the facts, Ma'am and you have none at all. The CRA was signed by Carter. Maybe you ought to go back to watching the soaps.

    Community Reinvestment Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    There was no Clinton surplus but what is a shame is that people like you only show your jealousy at how TX is being run wishing you were here. It is open season on liberals and none are allowed on the streets after dark except in Austin.
    Nice try, but your shenanigans are too obvious.

  8. #128
    Sage
    Conservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:25 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    67,264

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by lolabird View Post
    Nice try, but your shenanigans are too obvious.
    You are right, you have me figured out, posting actual verifiable websites and information is definitely a shenanigan. How dare me confuse a liberal with facts.

  9. #129
    Educator
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Last Seen
    01-03-14 @ 10:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    642

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative View Post
    You are right, you have me figured out, posting actual verifiable websites and information is definitely a shenanigan. How dare me confuse a liberal with facts.
    Is a Republican really an enigma in today's society?

  10. #130
    Guru
    Samhain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Northern Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:11 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    3,883

    Re: White House-No more Spending Cuts

    Quote Originally Posted by lolabird View Post
    I can't show you a surplus that is long gone. Wish I could though.
    The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 was signed into law by Bush on February 13, 2008. Are you seriously trying to persuade this audience that
    Bush convinced Senator Obama to sign it?
    Use the site he linked, and you can see that for the entire Clinton administration, the cumulative debt increased. You can state that Clinton had a budget surplus, but you can't say that he ran a surplus, as the actual Treasury data shows borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.

Page 13 of 14 FirstFirst ... 311121314 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •