Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

  1. #11
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:20 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,419
    Blog Entries
    12

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    Quote Originally Posted by []D e e v e s View Post
    The Clinton's are in no position to castigate Weiner. Bill Clinton is or was a lechor and unfaithful and Hillary rightly or wrongly forgave him. I don't see where Weiner and wife are to be faulted for pointing that out. Does it excuse either? No. Are they fair game? Yes.
    But they are... The Clintons... Demokrat Party royalty.

    Says volumes about the characterless party they represent and their propagandists dressed up as media. Just a bunch of dicks giving it to the rest of us... nice to see the lead a-holes get the shaft deep where the sun don't shine too... it's long, long, long overdue.

    Hope the dick stays in the race and trots out his Muslim Brotherhood wife regularly to scoop up the dung... just as Hillary had done.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  2. #12
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    36,897

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    Quote Originally Posted by humbolt View Post
    Sorry. I find Hillary disgusting on many levels. She and Bill are upset over comparisons to the Weiners? Give me a break. I want some answers on Benghazi out of her. Weiner hasn't gotten anybody killed yet, as far as we know.
    No, you give me a break. Please.

    If the Clintons are “upset” over comparisons to the Weiners, hilarious if they can’t see the obvious. I want answers on Benghazi too. So why distract from this legitimate issue and others by stooping to sexist and “weightist” smack? This is no different than the stupid, ugly “Caribou Barbie” stuff.

    Only Hillary Clinton experienced this first, before any of us had heard of Sarah Palin. Please, not this again.

    Whatever else can and should be said about her, I think she has earned, as a Senator and also as Secretary of State, the right to be regarded with the dignity that her service and her age have earned.

    The larger 21st century point is that focusing on the looks of a female politician, which too many continue to do, degrades the conversation, as do ancient insults about the woman’s sexual virtue. It is sexist. Posting a back-boobs POW pic of some poor trashy, oblivious soul who is obviously not Hillary Clinton doesn’t exactly elevate the discourse—it distracts from it.

  3. #13
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    18,262

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    Quote Originally Posted by nota bene View Post
    No, you give me a break. Please.

    If the Clintons are “upset” over comparisons to the Weiners, hilarious if they can’t see the obvious. I want answers on Benghazi too. So why distract from this legitimate issue and others by stooping to sexist and “weightist” smack? This is no different than the stupid, ugly “Caribou Barbie” stuff.

    Only Hillary Clinton experienced this first, before any of us had heard of Sarah Palin. Please, not this again.

    Whatever else can and should be said about her, I think she has earned, as a Senator and also as Secretary of State, the right to be regarded with the dignity that her service and her age have earned.

    The larger 21st century point is that focusing on the looks of a female politician, which too many continue to do, degrades the conversation, as do ancient insults about the woman’s sexual virtue. It is sexist. Posting a back-boobs POW pic of some poor trashy, oblivious soul who is obviously not Hillary Clinton doesn’t exactly elevate the discourse—it distracts from it.
    Well, I'll agree with you in part. It is juvenile. I will not, however, give Hillary any respect at all unless and until she quits positioning for a 2016 run at the expense of the people who died in Benghazi. This politician is a serial liar. We already have one of those running the country, and we don't need another. If we want to raise the level of discourse, we need to insist that the quality of person seeking office meet or exceed that level - not merely match the poor track record of the past two decades. The list of politicians who have held high office and did not deserve the respect the office would require is long. If this is sexist, it's no more sexist than the faux war on women. From my viewpoint, Hillary has done her level best to earn my scorn, female or not. I'll revise my opinion when and if she does something that falls in the category of "not purely self-serving". After all, she's dodged sniper fire. What's a little "fat" photo gonna do to hurt her?

  4. #14
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,597
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    The Clintons have denied that Post report. They admit they are "livid" with Anothony Wiener because they are good friends of Wiener's wife, Huma.

  5. #15
    Sage
    clownboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    08-17-16 @ 10:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    26,087

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    Actually Huma is right where Hillary was when Bill was governor setting his sights on a presidential run. Even then he was using state troopers to ferry his women to him.

  6. #16
    Canadian Conservative
    CanadaJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    27,186

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    Some of the biggest catfights begin when two hookers start arguing about who's the bigger whore.
    "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." William F. Buckley Jr.

  7. #17
    Guru
    Samhain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Northern Ohio
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:27 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    3,883

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    some pics
    I loved that bill. It actually allowed someone accused of any sexual assault on an Indian Reservation to lose their Right to Due Process. Classic stuff in there.

  8. #18
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Seen
    11-20-17 @ 01:31 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    346

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    Of course they (Clinton's) are livid. The Wiener comparison brings to the forefront their (Clinton's) past transgressions.

  9. #19
    Sage
    Erod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:36 AM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    13,057

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    No, the Clintons are pissed because the associations are real, and the transgressions are repetitive, just like Bill's.

  10. #20
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last Seen
    11-20-17 @ 01:31 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    346

    Re: Clintons mad as Hill over Huma tactic Fear Sextgate will hurt her in ’16

    Quote Originally Posted by DiAnna View Post
    The Clintons have denied that Post report. They admit they are "livid" with Anothony Wiener because they are good friends of Wiener's wife, Huma.
    There is that 'birds of a feather' thingy.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •