So George in a locked car and armed with the police on the way ... could not take pause and follow instructions from law enforcement yet ... the juror says Trayvon should have "When George confronted him, and he could have walked away and gone home " ...?"He could have ... When George confronted him, and he could have walked away and gone home.
In bold are her exact words.
Do you think unarmed teens being followed have different fear reactions than a husky big guy who knows the police are en-route with a car and armed? We do not even know any account but George's fishy tale.
Last edited by Turin; 07-16-13 at 10:05 PM.
Deflection ... do you agree with the juror that Trayvon should have ..."When George confronted him, and he could have walked away and gone home".
The forensics do not add up. The verdict was not based on forensics according to the juror but because they thought George was scared.
I'm not deflecting; I'm stating facts. Your opinion doesn't count, nor does mine, and we now have the words of one of six jurors. That's all. I am satisfied that the jury did a thoughtful job and am therefore accept the verdict. You should too--because the verdict is in.
"When George confronted him, and he could have walked away and gone home " ...?
The jurors are based the verdict on their belief that George was scared ... it was an injustice and you know it. This is a political forum and we are discussing if a person should just run when confronted like the juror said of Trayvon.
Last edited by Turin; 07-16-13 at 10:31 PM.
Martin is dead because he walked home in the rain in a hoodie and an armed man in a locked car with the police on their way continued pursuit while whining "they always get away".
There is no account of the last few moments and yet ... the juror states clearly "When George confronted him, and he could have walked away and gone home " ...?
I heard the tapes and Trayvon was walking and George even describes the pursuit. Eventually when George was close enough Trayvon turned and stood his ground.
Shouldn't the title of this thread be "Holder Speaks out Against States Rights?"