there is factually no back track at all, you posting lies wont change that i stand by everything i said
you never said in your original post it was just opinion, thats a lie that nobody falls for because your original post which was proven to be 100% wrong is stil here for everybody to read.
Its funny watching how emotional you get when you are proved wrong.
if you would now like to clarify and admit you misspoke, didnt speak clearly and or you only have the OPINION she didnt do her job and should be removed, that is fine.
I will simply tell you that you are entitled to your opinion but on this specific subject matter facts and law disagree with you, facts defeat you again, they seem to be your kryptonite.
in this whole thread I have made 2 points only..2 points
1 that this woman
should be fired
2 that this woman
can be fired
my first post #40
woman should be removed from her office, for her failure to enforce law.
as officials of a government you are given duties to uphold, if you refuse to do your duty you can be removed.
although his woman feels its wrong to enforce such a law, and i can understand that, she can removed it would to be the decision of the people above her.
her feelings do not keep her immune from losing her job.
when you take a stance on something, you better be prepared, for what may happen.
AGENT J reply to my post /#40, weith his post 41
1.) sorry this is false and the law doesnt support you
2.) this is true, good think she has upheld her duties
3.) dont know what this says
4.) no they do not but that has no impact here
5.) im sure she is prepared.
my next post #42 responding to his post #41
1)
this is a personal opinion.......nothing about law here.
2)wrong .....if you dont do your job...you CAN be removed from it..it going to depend on her boss, of if the people petition to have her removed
3)its simply means again, i understand her feelings, not wanting to do this, however her feelings to not keep her from losing her job, if the people above her choose to let her go.
4) again if the people above her, or the people in general want her gone becuase of her actions...she will not hold her position.
5)well she better know the climate for making this decision, becuase if she is crying about its later, she is the only one to blame.
I CLEARLY STATE THAT THE WOMAN SHOULD BE REMOVED IS A PERSONAL OPINION OF MIND
AND I ALSO STATE THAT THE WOMAN CAN BE REMOVED BY PEOPLE ABOVE HER.
POST BY AGENT J#43... WHICH IS USELESS INFORMATION, AND WHERE HE STATES THAT I STATED NO OPINION OF MINE
1.) just facts that prove you wrong again and showing you are posting lies and making stuff up of course you call them useless though
2.) good thing thats not what we were discussing, everybody COULD lose thier job, meanignless
3.) no you did not
here is your first post
no where in there did you say that was opinion, then when i told you the bolded is false and the law doesnt support you, you told me i was wrong and thats only my personal opinion and theres nothign about law that supports you being false.
if you would now like to clarify and admit you misspoke, didnt speak clearly and or you only have the OPINION she didnt do her job and should be removed, that is fine.
I will simply tell you that you are entitled to your opinion but on this specific subject matter facts and law disagree with you, facts defeat you again.
AGAIN IN POST #42 I CLEARLY STATED THAT THE WOMAN SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE WAS MY OPINION.
AGENT J, HAS MADE A MISTAKE, AND WILL NOT ADMIT HIS ERROR INSTEAD HE CONTINUES TO THROW OUT MORE FALSE INFO, TO CONFUSE.