If I stop responding it doesn't mean I've conceded the point or agree with you. It only means I've made my point and I don't mind you having the last word. Please wait a few minutes before "quoting" me. I often correct errors for a minute or two after I post before the final product is ready.
It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
"Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911
If anything it's the government that is endorsing "corporatism" by picking/choosing "winners and losers."
At any rate presently there is plenty of competition - no business has a monopoly on anything - at least not at the consumer level.
you know i got the same reaction from liberals when i provided that chart in a different Political Forum they had a hard time believing that they been duped by the democrats all these years of them saying low income mothers live in destitute when the truth is if you add up all the government benefits the live as middle class
Liberals try to discredit it because it was used by a right wing think tank, but just like you i have to point out where the chart came from, and they just like you still don't want to believe it so they just like you stay in denial. I know it is hard to admit you been lied to all these years. i understand