• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2001-2010 was the warmest decade since records began

Pangia? I bet not even 5% would know.


In fact, I am a bit suspicious to what you know about AGW, outside of what Sean Hannity told you. Cause I have a sneaking suspicion you mean the last cohesive single continental landmass, but you may be talking about something else...

Here you go with the Fox News insults....

I don't watch TV and I don't allow others to dictate my ideas and my philosophies...... I learned that the hard way when I WAS a progressive growing up, until I realized that elite progressives do nothing but use people and buy them off for their votes in order to promote their authoritarian/totalitarian social agenda (communism)...

I don't do as I'm told and I don't regurgitate bull****..

AGW in its simplicity is epic bull****...

When these clowns refuse to consider solar activity and stick to human's as the cause of "climate change" - that smells like dirty socks... It's quite clear that they have a preconceived idea to prove not a string of evidence that leads them TO A THEORY...

Why would they use the scientific method when the majority of these clowns are out to get paid or destroy capitalism or deceptively paint the human race as evil because they're a bunch of tree huggers???

There are tons of reasons to irrationally subscribe to AGW for personal and political reasons not to mention monetary..

What reasons do those who spend time doing the real science get out of debunking the myth get out of it??? a bunch of assholes telling them they're nuts and conspiracy theorists just because they don't blindly accept??

Remember those real scientists that dissent are the ones talking about solar flares and Geo's natural course while these AGW quacks are talking about corporations, more government and taxing cow farts...
 
HAHAHAHA!

Actually, if you look at it like a scientist, it is colder, warmer or no significant difference from present. Not quite 50:50... more like 95:5 if you use the standard level of signfiicace at p=.05.


And I have done the 'research' myself. At least read quite a bit of it, and talked extensively to many scientists in the field. I dont do earth science research - I do cardiovascular research. Different animal, but same scientific concepts.

Its really not a controversial topic outside of Fox News.

No you're 100% wrong and you have clearly done ZERO investigation into the issue, subject and science of "climate change" other than what you're spoonfed on your progressive information source of choice..

As far as I'm concerned I could care less what you want to learn and what you want to blindly believe...

As soon as you can accept the fact that ideas you would like to agree with aren't necessarily true the sooner you will accept reality.

The only person that can educate you and change you is you and in order for that to happen you need to take the blinders off and just accept fact - the fact that has been purposely been hidden from you to promote an agenda...
 
No you're 100% wrong and you have clearly done ZERO investigation into the issue, subject and science of "climate change" other than what you're spoonfed on your progressive information source of choice..

As far as I'm concerned I could care less what you want to learn and what you want to blindly believe...

As soon as you can accept the fact that ideas you would like to agree with aren't necessarily true the sooner you will accept reality.

The only person that can educate you and change you is you and in order for that to happen you need to take the blinders off and just accept fact - the fact that has been purposely been hidden from you to promote an agenda...

Yes. Clearly your laser focused mind and well referenced writings will make me reconsider the fact that I have done ZERO (your emphasis) investigating and am being spoonfed information by those bastions of communism, Nature,Science.and PNAS.
 
Yes. Clearly your laser focused mind and well referenced writings will make me reconsider the fact that I have done ZERO (your emphasis) investigating and am being spoonfed information by those bastions of communism, Nature,Science.and PNAS.

Yes, much like I was once a progressive and a neo-con...

I suppose my mind and intellect evolves unlike millions of others who refuse to question ...

I understand where you're coming from however, you don't understand where I'm coming from.

I'm not looking for approval or acceptance - you are!

You may think I'm crazy, weird, brainwashed or ignorant but that's your insecurity...

The media doesn't tell you the truth they promote a party line.... You want the truth go look for it...

That's all I'm going to tell you...

I'm not your teacher and I'm not going to cite anything because you need to do that yourself to understand..

I'm done here...
 
Yes, much like I was once a progressive and a neo-con...

I suppose my mind and intellect evolves unlike millions of others who refuse to question ...

I understand where you're coming from however, you don't understand where I'm coming from.

I'm not looking for approval or acceptance - you are!

You may think I'm crazy, weird, brainwashed or ignorant but that's your insecurity...

The media doesn't tell you the truth they promote a party line.... You want the truth go look for it...

That's all I'm going to tell you...

I'm not your teacher and I'm not going to cite anything because you need to do that yourself to understand..

I'm done here...
This bolded sentence is a key I think. Acceptance often means adopting a group-think, rather than being an individual. Every time I turn around, these warmers are saying what these articles tell them. They are not thinking on their own. I find that rather sad.
 
This bolded sentence is a key I think. Acceptance often means adopting a group-think, rather than being an individual. Every time I turn around, these warmers are saying what these articles tell them. They are not thinking on their own. I find that rather sad.

Absolutely...

It's the key of the collectivist - "group think."

That's why when you see progressives at political rallies they always repeat what the guy/woman with the megaphone says...

They're at those rallies for support - not to express their individual ideas because as a collective the individual ideas are owned by the group... Think outside that box and they will no longer be part of said group..

And people wonder why I use the words "zombies" and "sheep" to describe these people... Well they earned that title just by following orders...
 
And people wonder why I use the words "zombies" and "sheep" to describe these people... Well they earned that title just by following orders...

LOL...

Sheeple, lemmings...
 
LOL...

Sheeple, lemmings...

Collectivists, mob mentality..... IDK...

I really have no desire to insult however I don't know what to say to the collectivists...

I figured it out for myself and hopefully these collectivists can become former collectivists and embrace themselves and their individualism instead of "group think."
 
Collectivists, mob mentality..... IDK...

I really have no desire to insult however I don't know what to say to the collectivists...

I figured it out for myself and hopefully these collectivists can become former collectivists and embrace themselves and their individualism instead of "group think."

I see them as people who are more than willing to give their allegiance to a higher power. They support the authorities above them, seemingly, without question. I cannot do that. I must understand what I am supporting. This is why I cannot support these authoritarian attempts to mold our energy sources as they see fit. I understand the sciences enough to see the BS, spin, etc.
 
I see them as people who are more than willing to give their allegiance to a higher power. They support the authorities above them, seemingly, without question. I cannot do that. I must understand what I am supporting. This is why I cannot support these authoritarian attempts to mold our energy sources as they see fit. I understand the sciences enough to see the BS, spin, etc.

Yes, they're collectivists that play a social game of "follow the leader."

Of course collectivism is the heart of socialism, authoritarianism/totalitarianism (which I would call these Obamabots - totalitarian)..

These ideas of course have been in the communist playbook since Marx ... "The collective is stronger than the individual."
 
There are none....

Why? do you want change the subject of the farce aka "global warming?"

What evidence do you have that "global warming" isn't a conspiracy???

Furthermore you're attempting to claim that I'm the only one that believes this factual conspiracy, when in reality many in the scientific community concur that "global warming" is a farce and a conspiracy that is being used to control people like you and employ quacks - not to mention satisfy the "humans are evil" crowed....

Follow the money.....

The reality is that there is not one scientific organization anywhere in the world that hasn't concluded that the average temperature of the Earth is increasing, and that human causes are exacerbating the change. Not one.

It's really just an argument between wacky conspiracy theorists and the scientific community, but the latter really doesn't care what the WCT think. They just focus on the data.
 
Dittohead not! said:
The reality is that there is not one scientific organization anywhere in the world that hasn't concluded that the average temperature of the Earth is increasing,
I agree.


Dittohead not! said:
and that human causes are exacerbating the change. Not one.
I agree. Human activity exacerbates global warming.


Dittohead not! said:
It's really just an argument between wacky conspiracy theorists and the scientific community, but the latter really doesn't care what the WCT think. They just focus on the data.
See, that is your mindset. You fail to address the actual debate.

Why do you fail to understand, that people like me are not saying we deny such truths. We only disagree with the amount of warming that is claimed to be caused by mankind.

I really get sick of you guys failing to understand our argument.
 
I agree.



I agree. Human activity exacerbates global warming.



See, that is your mindset. You fail to address the actual debate.

Why do you fail to understand, that people like me are not saying we deny such truths. We only disagree with the amount of warming that is claimed to be caused by mankind.

I really get sick of you guys failing to understand our argument.

That's the only part of the argument that is even a little bit sustainable. How much global warming is due to human activities? On that point, there still is some room to debate.

As for all the scientific organizations skewing data and publishing false information in order to keep the research dollars flowing, that's just a WCT, pure and simple.
 
Oh my... some of these posts... I can barely stay in my chair.

The BLACK helicopters get the proGRESSIVES are trying to KILL y0u want take your money for $$$$$$$$$$$$ PROFIT BECAUSE that's what THEY DO to take your FOOL if U B_LEAVE they can TAKE your money.

I KNOW that you can take scientific reasoning if you MAKE IT ?HARD CONSERVATIVE patriot, for FOOLS THAT PRETY ON WEAK MINDED LIBURURULS.

THOSE they aren't sheep KNOW you can RIGHT TO BARE ARMS.

Ain't no fool.

!!!!!

AGW ALARMISRT ALL GORE.


!

!
!!
 
The reality is that there is not one scientific organization anywhere in the world that hasn't concluded that the average temperature of the Earth is increasing, and that human causes are exacerbating the change. Not one.

It's really just an argument between wacky conspiracy theorists and the scientific community, but the latter really doesn't care what the WCT think. They just focus on the data.

everyone knows that is true. even the denialists on this forum.

they can pretend they are more expert than those who research climate issues, but they don't fool anyone. not even themselves.

they know they are pushing waste material uphill.
 
Back
Top Bottom