- Joined
- Sep 25, 2012
- Messages
- 7,908
- Reaction score
- 1,764
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Pangia? I bet not even 5% would know.
In fact, I am a bit suspicious to what you know about AGW, outside of what Sean Hannity told you. Cause I have a sneaking suspicion you mean the last cohesive single continental landmass, but you may be talking about something else...
Here you go with the Fox News insults....
I don't watch TV and I don't allow others to dictate my ideas and my philosophies...... I learned that the hard way when I WAS a progressive growing up, until I realized that elite progressives do nothing but use people and buy them off for their votes in order to promote their authoritarian/totalitarian social agenda (communism)...
I don't do as I'm told and I don't regurgitate bull****..
AGW in its simplicity is epic bull****...
When these clowns refuse to consider solar activity and stick to human's as the cause of "climate change" - that smells like dirty socks... It's quite clear that they have a preconceived idea to prove not a string of evidence that leads them TO A THEORY...
Why would they use the scientific method when the majority of these clowns are out to get paid or destroy capitalism or deceptively paint the human race as evil because they're a bunch of tree huggers???
There are tons of reasons to irrationally subscribe to AGW for personal and political reasons not to mention monetary..
What reasons do those who spend time doing the real science get out of debunking the myth get out of it??? a bunch of assholes telling them they're nuts and conspiracy theorists just because they don't blindly accept??
Remember those real scientists that dissent are the ones talking about solar flares and Geo's natural course while these AGW quacks are talking about corporations, more government and taxing cow farts...