its not the governments responsibility to create jobs is is the government responsibility to get out of the way and let the free market create jobs if you want to live where it is the governments duty to do so you can move to Cuba or N.Koria
I will like to ask you a question sense you think you have the answer to job creation. explain why does N. Dakota has their unemployment rate at 3% and a McDonalds worker makes over 16 dollars an hour almost twice the minimum wage? was it because of the government or the free market? why is it that a McDonalds worker makes over 16 dollars an hour did N.Dakota raise the minimum wage to 16 an hour?
so you can live by your theories on paper that has been proven don't work time and time again or you can go with what has been proven to work through out history
this is the problem with people who think they know economics they go to collages that are run by the socialist left. they teach their sheep that go how great socialism is. they teach their socialist theories and ignore history that has proven what works and that is free market capitalism
you are better off learning economics from a community collage class run by some retired businessman he has real word experience what works and what doesn't
Last edited by trfjr; 07-07-13 at 06:24 PM.
You are the typical reich winger that wants to line the pockets of the super rich who care nothing for you.
No, you have made it clear time and again that YOU don't care about the unemployed, you don't want jobs programs, you won't hire the long term unemployed, you believe they should be punished.Numbers that only matter to people who actually care about the unemployed. you apparently don't
The wealthy have plenty of investment income, they have been swallowing up ALL of the wealth gains for a very long time.Maybe one of these days you will learn where investment income comes from just like spending income
Those that spend their incomes have cut back dramatically because they are not getting that share any longer.
And yet you just differentiated the Presidential term and the associated fiscal term.....without making any point.No, you stated that most of the 100% of job losses occurred during the Bush fiscal year but the Bush term ended in January 2009.
Ah, you are confused about non farm EMPLOYMENT (what I am talking about) and unemployment. You are confusing who is responsible for those job losses. I still find it so weird how you would not hire the long term unemployed....yet you continue to use them in your arguments. It is so hypocritical.How many months of 2010-2011-2012 did Obama have a million people discouraged and not counted as unemployed?
I just find it amazing how you continue to conflate two different stats.Net increase in employment with over a million no longer counted. That is like putting your finger to plug a pint sized leak
How does that work? You praise the GOP for not creating any effective jobs programs, we are commenting on the same thing....yet when I point out they are not creating effective jobs programs, I somehow lose credibility?Of course you do which is why you lack any credibility.
You just shot yourself in the foot.