Again, more rambling, totally pointless.Your opinion noted, since unemployment rate isn't solely on non farm payroll and since the only reduction in govt jobs is at the state level which Obama doesn't control, you are again building a typical liberal strawman. Obama is a disaster and you support him so wonder what that makes you?
I'll answer the only bit of coherence, we have kept up with population growth, we have not surpassed it because of depressed demand and the lack of investment.Of course you didn't nor did you explain why there are still 2 million fewer people working today than when the recession started as well as your inability to explain why the labor force hasn't kept up with population growth. You really have no idea what BLS reports so I suggest you find out what jobs are actually being created and what age group
Yes, I just did since that was the first time in this discussion where you asked me. You are confused about who you were debating.That isn't what you stated,
Um, payroll was INCREASING in that time period, there was a net GAIN in employment.so rather than admit you are wrong you continue to make things worse. Bush wasn't in office in 2010-2011-2012 when job losses were actually worse but then again a discouraged worker really doesn't exist because they aren't counted.
I am blaming the lack of effective job programs on the GOP and the reich wing within it.You really need to change your alias to gimmesomelies because that is what liberals do to you. Obama wasn't President when the recession started but claimed he had the answers. He lied and you still blame Bush.