The funniest part is watching you cherry pick between nominal and real figures to support your position.
For example ... during Reagan's terms, nominal figures were more favorable than real figures.
You cherry picked the nominal figures for Reagan because they were better.
During Obama's presidency, nominal figures are also more favorable than real figures.
For Obama, you cherry picked the real figures since they are worse.
And don't think for a second I'm the only one here who notices your dishonesty.
I believe this is a game on your part for no one is dumb enough to continue to buy the Obama rhetoric when the results are quite different.
Oh wow.....an ad hominem.....I didnt' see that one coming.This really has been a waste of time. You are why I need a break every now and then from this forum. You symbolize a true Obamabot and before you report this an Obamabot is an official definition of an Obama supporter from the urban dictionary
Urban Dictionary: Obamabot
You simply have no concept of investment, return on investment, and the role of the Federal Govt. Maybe if millions more would just trust Obama and Obamanomics like you we wouldn't have these economic numbers but bet we would have more bankruptcies.