Page 34 of 40 FirstFirst ... 243233343536 ... LastLast
Results 331 to 340 of 394

Thread: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

  1. #331
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    07-19-14 @ 03:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,109

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by Papa bull View Post
    Just because what you said wasn't what you meant doesn't mean I should have known that... "Well, gee, you should have asked instead of assuming what I said was what I meant since what I said wasn't really what I meant." OKeedokee. But I get it.... It's my fault for accepting what you said at face value; not your fault for saying something that sounded so queer. I used to think you were a centrist, but that sort of thing tells me you're really a lefty.
    I don't particularly care to consider Papa Bull's interchange with Captain Courtesy, but to me Captain Courtesy has an unmistakable liberal bias from the many comments I have read.

  2. #332
    Sage
    Papa bull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Midwest
    Last Seen
    06-25-15 @ 01:35 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    6,927

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainCourtesy View Post
    This, of course, has no basis in reality. Homosexuality has been proven to be normal. It is nothing but the rant of someone who does not understand the information that surrounds this topic, or the rant of someone who refuses to understand information that surrounds this topic. Either way, there is nothing of substance in the rant.
    Someone has their own personal definition of "normal", I see. The good ol', everything is "normal" if it's "normal" for me disingenuous schtick. Always good fun that one.
    You can't reason anyone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into in the first place.

  3. #333
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    07-19-14 @ 03:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,109

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainCourtesy View Post
    This, of course, has no basis in reality. Homosexuality has been proven to be normal. It is nothing but the rant of someone who does not understand the information that surrounds this topic, or the rant of someone who refuses to understand information that surrounds this topic. Either way, there is nothing of substance in the rant.
    CC, Your exaggerated Liberal bias is clearly on display if you deny the following as you just did:

    "Words have meaning. When one takes NATURE's first imperative, i.e. PROCREATION, and the liberals and homosexuals crap on that. Then, take millenia's primary definition of the word "MARRIAGE" as the official definition of the union between MAN and WOMAN .....and the liberals and homosexuals outrageously for their own agenda transform the meaning of the word MARRIAGE"...... the obvious conclusion is abundantly clear.
    Last edited by HoongLoong; 07-05-13 at 12:30 PM.

  4. #334
    Sage
    Papa bull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Midwest
    Last Seen
    06-25-15 @ 01:35 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    6,927

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by HoongLoong View Post
    I don't particularly care to consider Papa Bull's interchange with Captain Courtesy, but to me Captain Courtesy has an unmistakable liberal bias from the many comments I have read.
    After spending quite a bit of time on politics in political forums over the years (even on a site I owned and ran myself), nothing represents progressives that have been given moderator "buttons" better than....

    You can't reason anyone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into in the first place.

  5. #335
    Guru
    brothern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    3,187
    Blog Entries
    8

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by HoongLoong View Post
    CC, Your exaggerated Liberal bias is clearly on display if you deny the following as you just did:

    "Words have meaning. When one takes NATURE's first imperative, i.e. PROCREATION, and the liberals and homosexuals crap on that. Then, take millenia's primary definition of the word "MARRIAGE" as the official definition of the union between MAN and WOMAN .....and the liberals and homosexuals outrageously for their own agenda transform the meaning of the word MARRIAGE"...... the obvious conclusion is abundantly clear.
    Reality has a well known liberal bias. :/

  6. #336
    Guru
    brothern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    3,187
    Blog Entries
    8

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by HoongLoong View Post
    CC, Your exaggerated Liberal bias is clearly on display if you deny the following as you just did:

    "Words have meaning. When one takes NATURE's first imperative, i.e. PROCREATION, and the liberals and homosexuals crap on that. Then, take millenia's primary definition of the word "MARRIAGE" as the official definition of the union between MAN and WOMAN .....and the liberals and homosexuals outrageously for their own agenda transform the meaning of the word MARRIAGE"...... the obvious conclusion is abundantly clear.
    In opposition, the homophobic atmosphere of society during your childhood does not constitute nature's definition of what is "normal" or "unnatural". Homosexuality has, as you clearly recognize, been common since the beginning of humanity and will continue to be long after our passing. Why? Simple: It's a natural and normal part of human sexuality driven by an innate, biological and unchangeable part of the human psyche.

    So unlike any other human circumstance that could be deemed as "bad", we see (through science and the medicial community) that homosexuality does not cause harm to the individual or others, but rather, is able to enrich an individual's life so fully through human emotions such as companionship, love and mutual support that it would be immoral to deprive these individuals of this.

    I may also add that capitalizing select words like MARRIAGE or NATURE does little other than to make you sound like a raving lunatic.

  7. #337
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    07-19-14 @ 03:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,109

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by brothern View Post
    In opposition, the homophobic atmosphere of society during your childhood does not constitute nature's definition of what is "normal" or "unnatural". Homosexuality has, as you clearly recognize, been common since the beginning of humanity and will continue to be long after our passing. Why? Simple: It's a natural and normal part of human sexuality driven by an innate, biological and unchangeable part of the human psyche.

    So unlike any other human circumstance that could be deemed as "bad", we see (through science and the medicial community) that homosexuality does not cause harm to the individual or others, but rather, is able to enrich an individual's life so fully through human emotions such as companionship, love and mutual support that it would be immoral to deprive these individuals of this.

    I may also add that capitalizing select words like MARRIAGE or NATURE does little other than to make you sound like a raving lunatic.
    GAY Brothern,

    The whole issue of the "NORMALITY" of the unnatural homosexuals is based on NATURE's FIRST IMPERATIVE which is PROCREATION......to deny that is more than BIZARRE ...... it's like saying apples are the same as chairs. To negate NATURE in discussing whats "normal" in NATURE and what isn't ..... is PREPOSTEROUS ! One might as well negate "MOTHER" in MOTHERHOOD, CAMELS in the word "CAMEL", etc.

    Also, to negate the word MARRIAGE when the whole issue revolves around the bogus assertion that "GAY" MARRIAGE is valid is ridiculous on its face.

    You sound beyond BIZARRE !

  8. #338
    Guru
    brothern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    3,187
    Blog Entries
    8

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by HoongLoong View Post
    GAY Brothern,

    The whole issue of the "NORMALITY" of the unnatural homosexuals is based on NATURE's FIRST IMPERATIVE which is PROCREATION......to deny that is more than BIZARRE ...... it's like saying apples are the same as chairs. To negate NATURE in discussing whats "normal" in NATURE and what isn't ..... is PREPOSTEROUS ! One might as well negate "MOTHER" in MOTHERHOOD, CAMELS in the word "CAMEL", etc.

    Also, to negate the word MARRIAGE when the whole issue revolves around the bogus assertion that "GAY" MARRIAGE is valid is ridiculous on its face.

    You sound beyond BIZARRE !
    ... and your name sounds like a bad cock joke.

    Where does it say that nature even has an imperative?

  9. #339
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    07-19-14 @ 03:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,109

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    Quote Originally Posted by brothern View Post
    ... and your name sounds like a bad cock joke.

    Where does it say that nature even has an imperative?
    MY RESPONSE:

    To a twisted mind anything might sound like a "bad cock" joke. It so happens that HOONG LOONG in Chinese means RED DRAGON. And, before you immerse yourself into any addirtional fantasies, it simply is a colorful pseudonym and nothing more.

    If you happen to be ignorant of NATURE's first imperative being PROCREATION than you sound even more mentally deficient (and unnatural) than you already are. It is only NATURAL that different species in NATURE want to propagate their own species......even the gays, as unnatural as cancer, want to propagate their own unnatural selves.

  10. #340
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,827

    re: After DOMA, gay couples still would not receive many federal benefits. [W:345]

    FACTS


    legal marriage has ZERO to do with the following:
    Religion
    Procreation

    Gay Marriage was around BC
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

Page 34 of 40 FirstFirst ... 243233343536 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •