Lets take a look at what your just wrote through a similar lens: "What freedom not freedom is to violate the voting rights of others, force them to go against their beliefs and impose morality upon societies that have decided that inter-racial unions are not within the definition of marriage. Freedom is not having those who lose in a democratic battle screaming and crying about feeling discriminated (when it isn't illegal) and then forcing their beliefs into law upon the majority. That is tyranny. Forcing states that have banned inter-racial marriage to accept it is tyranny. It violates the principals of the people in that state and imposes a moral code upon people that have rejected such. In an identical way it would also be tyrannical to do so to a state that has approved of inter-racial marriage but forcing them to go against that"
Digs...the SAME EXACT argument that you are making was raised by the bigots who fought against inter-racial marriage. There is no difference whatsoever.