Boo Radley
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 37,066
- Reaction score
- 7,028
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I couldn't agree more. The government needs to get out of the marriage business, too.
Sounds like sour grapes.
I couldn't agree more. The government needs to get out of the marriage business, too.
National Socialism...
1. Totalitarian
2. Nationalistic
3. Anti-intellectual
4. Pro Military
5. Anti-Semitic
6, Anti-Communistic
7. Anti-Rationalistic
8. Anti-Liberalistic
9. Anti-Democratic
10. Pro Supreme Race
That is a progressive movement?
National Socialism (political movement, Germany) -- Encyclopedia Britannica
Damn near a carbon copy of Progressiveism/Liberalism.
add business to that also..:mrgreen:
Just as bigots had to allow people they don't like to marry, bigots in business have to allow people they don't like to frequent their establishment.
wrong, government has no authority in marriage, and government has no authority to control ones property.
dont worry friend, i will get you turned around sooner of later....you will see the light of day!
Sounds like sour grapes.
Nero and Elagabalus. Not exactly a historical secret. In fact, it is something Christians usually use to argue against same sex marriage because Nero was kind of a huge ass to Christians and he was allegedly into some pretty freaky stuff.
Oooookay. Are you going to deny the Holocaust next? Historical revisionism tends to set off my gag reflex.
Oh, so you DO want the givernment in the marriage biz? Read the Constitution lately?
Just as bigots had to allow people they don't like to marry, bigots in business have to allow people they don't like to frequent their establishment.
and you think the actions of the two most demented roman emperors in history is GOOD for your argument?! Couldn't find a gay marriage in Caligula's closet? a pity
I said it wasn't the majorities business. The government just has to treat everyone's the same.
Is that all you got?
sorry you failed with this
how can liberals.say this: is unconstitutional for a state government and its people to ban SSM, because states believe that SSM i will be harmful to the institution of marriage, ..while denying SS couples there rights.
but in the same breath say.......its constitutional for the people and its state government, to ban discrimination becuase its is harmful to a person, .....while infringing on the rights of property owners?
When it comes to laws and equal representation I think they should be there. After all that is why we have government, right?
Why would I need more?
It's clear you don't know what's being argued. You keep framing it wrong, trying to twist it into something not really argued. I argue it's not right nor legal to discriminate. That us consistent with both arguments. Read it slower. Take in what us actually being said.
sure i am, you have said government can make laws to take away rights of people, becuase of discrimination..using statutory laws.
but you also said. goverment cannot make laws which take away the rights of people to marry, becuase that's discrimination ,even though those laws are constitutional amendments to a states constitution.
whats in play here, the rights of people which the government cannot make any law to take away rights of the people, unless a crime has been committed, or its health and safety issue
Because your historicall devoid argument is taking on water, fast.
National Socialism attempted to reconcile conservative, nationalist ideology with a socially radical doctrine. In so doing, it became a profoundly revolutionary movement—albeit a largely negative one.
I said the government can't discriminate. They can't. Keep focused. It's all about not discriminating.
Sure, but get government out of our marriages.
I'll let you take the debate up with Britannica.
National Socialism (political movement, Germany) -- Encyclopedia Britannica
Britannica? That's your source? LOL!
The National Socialists created universal healthcare in Germany. They had extensive welfare. They supported labor unions. Not to mentio, Hitler was a socialist, anyway. There's nothing Conservative about the National Socialists.
Pfft only because them there gays are getting married! I doubt you will be willing to give this up this in your heterosexual marriage:
An Overview of Federal Rights and Protections Granted to Married Couples | Resources | Human Rights Campaign